Leading scientists call for global warming treaty
September 30, 1997
Web posted at: 10:00 p.m. EDT (0200 GMT)
WASHINGTON (Reuter) -- Days before a White House conference
to fight global warming, 1,500 scientists from around the
world Tuesday urged immediate action to curb man-made climate
changes.
"Let there be no doubt about the conclusion of the scientific
community: the threat of global warming is very real and
action is needed immediately," Nobel laureate Henry Kendall
said at a conference on global warming, sponsored by the
Union of Concerned Scientists which he chairs.
"It is a grave error to believe that we can continue to
procrastinate. Scientists do not believe this and no one else
should either," said Kendall, who also authored a statement
signed by the 1,500 scientists from 60 countries.
The scientists, including 98 Nobel laureates, urged world
leaders to adopt a strong treaty to fight emissions of carbon
from burning fossil fuels that are changing the climate.
Without swift action, they said the world faces a future of
rising sea levels, more intense storms and droughts, food
shortages, spreading diseases and vanishing wildlife.
"This is a wake-up call for world leaders. Never before has
the senior scientific community spoken so boldly on the
urgent need to prevent disruption to our climate," said Nobel
laureate Dudley Herschbach, a Harvard University chemistry
professor.
President Clinton is hosting a conference October 6 to try to
generate support for a treaty that commits industrialized
countries to specific reductions in carbon emissions that
scientists say are accumulating in the atmosphere and
trapping heat.
But lawmakers on Capitol Hill Tuesday remained skeptical of
benefits of a climate change treaty, and doubtful of a
treaty's potential effects on the U.S. economy.
"We can't be sure that we would be doing the environment
any good since science still can't identify the human
fingerprint in the observed warming," Senate Energy Committee
Chairman Frank Murkowski said at a hearing on the issue.
His committee heard from the United Mine Workers of America,
the conservative Cato Institute think tank and other
witnesses that said a climate change treaty could cost the
United State more than 1.5 million jobs by 2005, limit the
nation's electricity supply, and trim the Gross Domestic
Product by up to $17 trillion from 2005 to 2015.
Committee members from both parties also complained that the
White House failed to send a representative to defend its
position, or explain how the administration intends to reduce
carbon emissions.
"It is outrageous that our State Department can negotiate a
new treaty with 164 other nations that will have tremendous
economic implications for our nation, but they cannot come to
Congress and defend their position," Murkowski, an Alaska
Republican, said.
"Instead we are here with no administration analysis and
no administration witness a mere 20 days from the next round
of negotiations in Bonn and 61 days from Kyoto," he said.
Negotiations for industrialized countries to agree to cut
emissions from burning fossil fuels are to end in December in
Kyoto, Japan.
"A climate change treaty that exempts developing countries is
an unfair and flawed approach," Sen. Wendell Ford, a Kentucky
Democrat, said. "My own state of Kentucky would be
devastated" by such a treaty, Ford said of his coal-producing
state.
Copyright 1997 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.