Courtesy alfarhan.org

I was here at that time and interviewed blogger Ahmed Al-Omran who was spearheading a campaign to get Al-Farhan freed. He told me Farhan was doing no more than exercising his right to free speech.

Government officials told me they hoped he would be freed soon, something that would be speeded if he cooperated with authorities they said.

Now, two months after Al-Fahan’s arrest, I am back in Saudi Arabia and I’m learning very little appears to have changed. Al-Farhan is still in detention.

I am surprised because when I left a month ago the balance of feedback I had from official and non-official sources was that this probably wouldn’t last much longer, he’d be freed fairly soon.

For sure no one said it would happen, but they let me feel it might, and soon, once the outcry, particularly in the western media had died down.

Now it appears perhaps it really was just that, spin to kill off the outcry.

Ahmed Al-Omran told me the campaign to release Al-Farhan is still active, they are frustrated he said because despite repeated calls to the Ministry of interior they say they stil don’t know why Al-Farhan is being held.

What the campaign wants, Al-Omran says, "is a clear statement of why Al-Farhan is being held." He also says the government is obliged to answer Human Rights groups who have been asking the same question.

What concerns Al-Farhan’s supporters the most right now is that as far they know he hasn’t been allowed to see a lawyer.

The only vaguely positive note they can report is that Al-Farhan’s mother in law was able to call him by phone a few days ago. They are not clear what was said during that 10 minute exchange. His health remains a major concern for his wife and two children.

By law the government can hold Farhan for 6 months without charge. His friends haven’t given up hope he’ll be free long before then.

-- From Nic Robertson, CNN Senior International Correspondent

In an update to a story we brought you late last year, Syria's Ambassador to the United States reportedly says a Middle East peace deal is not in the cards anytime soon.

Imad Moustapha tells the Associated Press that the Bush Administration is not serious about pushing the Israeli-Palestinian peace process forward. He goes on to suggest in his interview with the AP that there are powerful elements in the Bush administration who believe chaos in the region is actually constructive.

President Bush oversaw a Middle East peace summit in Annapolis, Maryland, in November. A Syrian delegation took part in those meetings.

In the summit's final communique, Mr. Bush announced that Israel and the Palestinians would set a goal for achieving a comprehensive peace deal by the end of the year. You may recall during Hala's interview with Middle East envoy Tony Blair that Blair said he felt that goal was achievable.

In the Ambassador's interview with the AP, Moustapha brushed aside that Annapolis peace summit as nothing more than "an exercise in public relations."

-- Submitted by CNN International Supervising Producer Ryan Cooper