On "The Situation Room" today, we asked viewers the following questions, and here are some of our favorite responses that we didn't get to read on air:

What does it mean for the U.S. when the British army chief says it's time to leave Iraq soon?

Jack, it means that the British General is in tune with what is really happening in Iraq. 600,000 Iraqi dead, more than 2,700 U.S. troops killed, no telling how many British troops killed, the country in civil war and the violence greater than ever. Our troops and the British troops are doing nothing but fueling the anger and terrorism in Iraq.
Bill, Washington

The British commander knows what the average Iraqi citizen knows, and that is the occupation of Iraq by foreign forces is exacerbating the tension and civil strife there instead of stopping it.
Earl, Honolulu, Hawaii

It means that someone has finally developed the guts to be honest. I wonder when someone in our leadership will be honest with the American people and say let's get out now.
Vivek, Austin, Texas

Should Democrats replace Harry Reid as minority leader in the Senate?

You bet. I lived in Nevada for many years and I have seen Harry Reid go from a reasonably principled, reasonably honest person, to a politician who has become eaten up with his own perceived importance and power. But then again, he is a lawyer so what else should we expect besides under-the-table secret deals and combinations. My bumper sticker still reads "If they're in office, I'm voting for the other guy."
Lewis, Missouri

Even though I'm a moderate Democrat, I haven't been too happy with Harry Reid as our minority leader. He's not well-spoken, speaks too softly, he's often moody with the press, and has had a couple of issues like the land deal and the boxing tickets that make him look like a Republican in the House. Frankly, I just don't find Reid very likable, and if it takes a technical issue like this to drive him out, so be it.
Jeff in Seattle

Could we wait for the trial before we hang him? If he did something wrong, then yes, the Democrats should have different leadership.
Mary, Iowa

Are you willing to vote against an incumbent, even if you like him, in order to change the government?

I'm an independent voter but without much choice in Georgia, however, I intend to vote against every office holder in my state in U.S. elections at this time. Both parties need an attitude adjustment that favors the voter not lobbyists and the "show me the money" crowd.
Tom, Atlanta, Georgia

I'm willing to vote the incumbents out of office in my district. In fact, I mean to. We desperately need to get the message out to people we elect that they can be un-elected! Can't wait for November!
Charles, Monroe, Connecticut

Absolutely, yes! I cannot take it anymore. I do not care whether the person that I am voting for is Republican or Democrat. I want the incumbent out so that Congress gets the message. Represent the people or get out!
Rose

I just filled out my absentee ballot, and voted against all incumbents but two. The reason: those two happen to be the only honest Republicans in Ohio. Facts are facts. Baby's diapers and politicians should be changed often. Ohio definitely has a stink over it.
Mary, Columbus, Ohio