On "The Situation Room" today, we asked viewers the following questions, and here are some of our favorite responses that we didn't get to read on air:
Should the U.S. go into Pakistan to catch Osama bin Laden?We should go wherever we have to go to capture or kill this animal. We should have gotten him over 3 years ago in Tora Bora, but "The Decider" decided it was more important to go into Iraq than to capture the world's #1 terrorist.
Jim, Livonia, MichiganWhat makes you think this administration would have any better success there than they have had in the past five years?
James, Folsom, CaliforniaNo I don't think the U.S. should just "go in and get him." That would prove the statement that Hugo Chavez said that Bush "thinks he rules the world."
Jeff, Alabama
That's all we need & that's all Musharraf needs... More war on his borders...
Patricia, CaliforniaIs Congress' voting to build a fence along the Mexican border 7 days before adjourning for the election campaign an empty political gesture?Of course this is an empty gesture, "Don't blame us, we passed legislation." For years, I was an accountant and the term "Cover your assets" was in vogue. I think that this is the case here.
George, Roanoke, VirginiaLet's see Jack, they voted to build the fence along ONE THIRD of the border - what does that tell you? How about all U.S. citizens paying ONE THIRD of our taxes?
D., Allentown, PennsylvaniaOf course the offer to construct the fence is a gesture and nothing more. Without funding the "fence" won't stop any more illegals or drugs than the unarmed, untrained National Guard troops that still have not arrived.
Don, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Referring to this as an "empty gesture" suggests that anything else they've done this year had any substance. It's more of the same – just closer to the midterms.
Pete, Orlando, Florida
