|
PERJURY (CONT.)
THE CHARGE
6 Lied to the Kenneth Starr grand jury about his sexual
relationship with Lewinsky
KEY EVIDENCE
Questioned about Lewinsky's testimony, Clinton said he stood by
his statement that he had never had "sexual relations," even
when asked if that included touching of breasts or genitals.
THE CHARGE
7 Lied in his deposition about being alone with Lewinsky and
about the gifts they exchanged
KEY EVIDENCE
Clinton admitted to the grand jury that he had been alone with
Lewinsky and had given her gifts just three weeks before the
deposition, even though he couldn't recall gifts during the
deposition itself.
THE CHARGE
8 Lied in his deposition about discussions with Lewinsky over
whether she would testify in the Jones case
KEY EVIDENCE
In his deposition, Clinton said he wasn't sure whether he and
Lewinsky discussed her testifying. But he told the grand jury
they did have "a conversation" about it shortly before the
deposition.
THE CHARGE
9 Lied in his deposition about his discussions with Jordan
concerning Lewinsky
KEY EVIDENCE
Though Clinton said in his deposition that he didn't know Jordan
had talked with Lewinsky about the Jones case, Jordan told the
grand jury Clinton thanked him for finding her a lawyer in the
case.
THE WHITE HOUSE VERSION
In Friday and Saturday rebuttals, Clinton's attorneys say he
didn't perjure himself and that Starr includes supposed examples
of lies about sex only for "shock value." They say some of the
questions he was asked were "ambiguous" and that he gave
"narrow," not false, answers in response. They point out that
one other person's testimony isn't enough for a perjury
conviction. And they say Starr never proves that Clinton
intended to lie--a requirement for perjury. One rebuttal says
Starr's real complaint about Clinton's gifts testimony is that
he "was not more forthcoming," which doesn't count as perjury.
Perhaps realizing all this sounds like hairsplitting, lawyer
Charles Ruff told reporters that "legal language" doesn't
diminish the President's apologies.
WITNESS TAMPERING
THE CHARGE
10 Attempted to influence Currie's testimony
KEY EVIDENCE
Currie told the grand jury that Clinton called her in on a
Sunday and asked her leading questions, such as, "I never
touched her, right?" She said he seemed "concerned" and wanted
to see her reaction.
THE WHITE HOUSE VERSION
Currie was never supposed to be a witness in the Jones case, so
talking with her wasn't tampering. And anyway, as the President
testified, he never intended to influence her recollection.
ABUSE OF POWER
THE CHARGE
11 Abused his constitutional authority in order to help cover
up his relationship with Lewinsky
KEY EVIDENCE
Clinton abused his power, says the report, by using public
denials, lies to the White House staff and the doctrine of
Executive Privilege to delay the investigation.
THE WHITE HOUSE VERSION
Failing to admit wrongdoing for a time isn't abusing power. And
the Executive Privilege assertion wasn't frivolous because Starr
was intruding into "legitimate confidential discussions."
PAGE 1 | PAGE 2
|