ad info


Asiaweek TIMEASIA.com CNN.com
 > magazine
 home
 intelligence
 web features
 magazine archive
 technology
 newsmap
 customer service
 subscribe
 TIMEASIA.COM
 CNN.COM
  east asia
  southeast asia
  south asia
  central asia
  australasia
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 SHOWBIZ
 ASIA WEATHER
 ASIA TRAVEL

Other News
TIME.com
TIME Europe
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com
Asiaweek Services
Contact Asiaweek
About Asiaweek
Media Kit
Get up to 3 months of Asiaweek free when you subscribe online!


AUGUST 11 , 2000 VOL. 26 NO. 31 | SEARCH ASIAWEEK


Asiaweek Pictures.

Viewpoint: Questioning Sanctions
It's time to re-examine their results in Myanmar

Rebecca Miller is paralegal consultant for the United Nations Drug Control Program's Regional Center for East Asia and the Pacific in Bangkok. The opinions expressed here are her own

Myanmar, which has suffered extensively from civil war, in much of the world is associated now with the suppression of democracy, the abuse of human rights, injustice, and the denial of freedom. Outraged by Myanmar's authoritarian regime, several Western powers invoked sanctions. The United States' measures include the suspension of economic aid, withdrawal of eligibility for trade and investment programs, an arms embargo, and a bar on assistance from international financial institutions. The European Union adopted similar sanctions, but in Bangkok last week it announced exceptions for humanitarian aid and programs of non-government organizations. Japan and Australia have suspended most of their bilateral aid programs, and the International Labour Organization (ILO) adopted an unprecedented resolution stopping Myanmar's participation in meetings.

The regime's repressive control has contributed to Myanmar's failing economy, but it is possible that sanctions have too — with consequences for the populace. There can be trade-offs in applying sanctions. No doubt they are a powerful tool in enacting change: a way, says Lloyd Axworthy, Canada's minister of foreign affairs, to prevent or stop violence against civilians and save lives in the face of brutality and destruction — vital for the U.N. to protect people. Apparently, the U.S. believes that sanctions are the only way to effectively address the situation in Myanmar, and it holds that the regime's mismanagement is the chief cause of the faltering economy. Axworthy says that if we examine history, results of sanctions seem to be mixed. Indeed. It is important to evaluate whether the impact of sanctions, in terms of human suffering, is too high. Undoubtedly they affect innocents who often find themselves isolated and lacking international support. Ironically they are then left to face the adverse consequences sanctions were intended to relieve.

During the 1990s, the U.N. invoked a record number of sanctions against countries that did not conform to international standards of behavior toward other nations or their own citizens. Sanctions have offered the Security Council the necessary support to enforce its decisions, stronger than condemnation yet not as intrusive or confrontational as force. But recently, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan acknowledged that they might not always be the best solution: "When robust and comprehensive economic sanctions are directed against authoritarian regimes, a different problem is encountered — it is usually the people who suffer, not the political elite whose behavior triggered the sanctions." He said sanctions often benefit individuals in power because of their ability to control and profit from the black-market economy. Moreover, sanctions appear not to have stopped regimes from silencing or eliminating internal political opposition. Some of the world's worst human rights abuses have been facilitated by isolation.

Axworthy believes that targeted sanctions should be combined creatively with targeted incentives in foreign assistance, debt relief and trade benefits. The International Committee of the Red Cross provides an example. In 1998 — three years after it had withdrawn from Myanmar — the Red Cross decided to resume operations. While some in the international community were critical, its return was welcomed by the regime and eventually National League for Democracy (NLD) leader Aung San Suu Kyi as well. After 1995, Myanmar had contacted the Red Cross and an agreement was negotiated on one of the most sensitive issues — prisons and the detention of political detainees. It is difficult to discount the Red Cross's achievements. Its officers have access to 25 prisons, the guesthouses where NLD ministers are held and two labor camps, and meet regularly with inmates. Former Red Cross chief Leon de Riedmatten's advice to those seeking improvements in Myanmar: Be open to negotiations and give authorities the responsibility to make important decisions.

U.N. organizations play diverse roles in Myanmar. Contrasting with the ILO is the position of the World Health Organization, which recognized the country's drastic need for help on reproductive health issues and the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The Children's Fund, UNICEF, also has taken a cooperative approach, contending that with the suspension of bilateral assistance, programs for children's health, nutrition and education are urgently required. The U.N. Drug Control Program is among the few U.N. agencies providing assistance to Myanmar and working with its officials. With UNDCP guidance, Myanmar is engaged in subregional cooperation in drug abuse control and domestic programs.

It is time for the international community to re-examine the role and impact of sanctions. They have a place, but the issue is whether they are viewed as a hammer or a laser. There is evidence that sanctions against Myanmar have not achieved all the desired results. Moreover, constructive engagement, in limited instances, appears to have had positive results. Therefore, it is prudent to explore the potential of an active dialogue with Myanmar with the goal of fostering an enhancement of human rights, reduction of the drug trade, and to alleviate the widespread poverty that ravages the country.



Write to Asiaweek at mail@web.asiaweek.com

This edition's table of contents | Asiaweek.com Home

AsiaNow


Quick Scroll: More stories from Asiaweek, TIME and CNN

   LATEST HEADLINES:

WASHINGTON
U.S. secretary of state says China should be 'tolerant'

MANILA
Philippine government denies Estrada's claim to presidency

ALLAHABAD
Faith, madness, magic mix at sacred Hindu festival

COLOMBO
Land mine explosion kills 11 Sri Lankan soldiers

TOKYO
Japan claims StarLink found in U.S. corn sample

BANGKOK
Thai party announces first coalition partner



TIME:

COVER: President Joseph Estrada gives in to the chanting crowds on the streets of Manila and agrees to make room for his Vice President

THAILAND: Twin teenage warriors turn themselves in to Bangkok officials

CHINA: Despite official vilification, hip Chinese dig Lamaist culture

PHOTO ESSAY: Estrada Calls Snap Election

WEB-ONLY INTERVIEW: Jimmy Lai on feeling lucky -- and why he's committed to the island state



ASIAWEEK:

COVER: The DoCoMo generation - Japan's leading mobile phone company goes global

Bandwidth Boom: Racing to wire - how underseas cable systems may yet fall short

TAIWAN: Party intrigues add to Chen Shui-bian's woes

JAPAN: Japan's ruling party crushes a rebel at a cost

SINGAPORE: Singaporeans need to have more babies. But success breeds selfishness


Launch CNN's Desktop Ticker and get the latest news, delivered right on your desktop!

Today on CNN
 Search
  ASIAWEEK'S LATEST
Web-only Exclusives
November 30, 2000

From Our Correspondent: Hirohito and the War
A conversation with biographer Herbert Bix

From Our Correspondent: A Rough Road Ahead
Bad news for the Philippines - and some others

From Our Correspondent: Making Enemies
Indonesia needs friends. So why is it picking fights?


  THIS EDITION

COVER: Giant on the Move
An emerging Asian superpower
On the Move: The people who are reshaping the nation
Worth Knowing: People with a role to play as India grows
The Economy: Risk-takers and innovators take center-stage
Wealth: The big six
Question Time: An interview with Azim Hashim Premji
Personally Speaking: Distinguished Indians scan the way ahead
The Military: Adding muscle in a bid for a regional role
The Media: Tough competition in a free and lively environment
Mass Culture: From beauty to fashion, India sets the pace

ASIAWEEK.COM
COVER: Playing the Modern Game
Improve your golf game with better technology

Face Off: Audio recorders

Healthcare: Take care on websites for the unwell

Net Gains: Be wary of stock tips in chat rooms

E-vesting: The high cost of online trading

Asiaweek/CNN Tech Index: The Asiaweek/CNN basket of 40 companies

B2B: Learning the job online

Wired Exec: A Manila publisher at work and play

Cutting Edge: Point, shoot and print — digitally

EDITORIALS
Troops: Why America may have to pull its soldiers out of Asia

Pyongyang: Is there substance behind its new, improved style?

Letters & Comment: UMNO on the changes within

THE NATIONS

ASEAN: North Korea steals the limelight at the Bangkok meeting
Agreement: Rail uniting the Koreas
Interview: With East Timor's Gusmao and Ramos-Horta

INDONESIA: Who bombed the Philippine ambassador?

THAILAND: The big parties are gearing up for the general election
Interview: Chalerm on the NAP's future prospects

Scandals: Imelda is caught with her hand in the cookie jar

KASHMIR: A ceasefire brings hopes of peace — maybe

Newsmakers: Reading Anson Chan's moves

Viewpoint: Time to re-examine sanctions on Myanmar

BUSINESS
Performance: Is Hong Kong's GEM the worst stock exchange?
Competition: How Asia's other second-boards are doing

Investing: Stay the course in telecommunications and electronics

Insurance: Agents scramble to sell the mainland peace of mind
Charge: Card issuers expect China's consumers to embrace credit

Business Buzz: The teetering house of Hyundai


Back to the top   © 2000 Asiaweek. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.