Flipping The Script
Eric Pooley Reported by Michael Duffy, Tamala M. Edwards, Karen Tumulty, Douglas Waller and Michael Weisskopf/Washington,
James Carney and John F. Dickerson/with Bush and Tim Padgett and Timothy Roche/Tallahassee
Late last Friday afternoon, Senator Patrick Leahy, the
gentlemanly Democrat from Vermont, sequestered himself in his
office on Capitol Hill and ordered his aides not to interrupt him
for anything short of war. "I don't care what's going on," he
told them. "I don't want to be bothered." A bushelful of memos
had piled up on his desk, the fruit of a frantic political week
of Senate power struggles framed inside the titanic power
struggle for the White House. Leahy figured the Florida Supreme
Court would bring the hammer down on Al Gore's final appeal and
didn't care to watch. So he glared when an aide came in just
after 4 p.m. "I think you may want to hear what the court just
did," the aide told him. "Well, is it all over?" Leahy asked.
"No, it's just starting," the aide said. Leahy's paperwork really
had been interrupted by news of war. "Oh, boy," Leahy said. The
state supreme court--in a bitterly divided 4-to-3 ruling--had found
for Gore, cutting Bush's Florida lead from 537 votes to 193 (or
154, depending on how some disputed ballots are counted) and
ordering an immediate recount of 42,000 "undervotes" from around
the state. The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
Leahy will be in the thick of things if the election dispute ends
up in Congress. He summoned his staff lawyers and ordered them to
dig through the law books and statutes, war-gaming all the ways
this fight could go. But it was moving so fast that his lawyers
couldn't possibly keep up.
By Saturday afternoon, the recount was under way in Florida,
with a strong chance that by day's end Gore might pick up enough
votes to move ahead of Bush for the first time. Then the U.S.
Supreme Court joined the battle. In another acrimonious split
decision--this one 5 to 4--the Justices halted the recount and
scheduled oral arguments for Monday on George W. Bush's claim
that the manual counts are unconstitutional and could do
"irreparable harm" to his candidacy. Al Gore's top lawyer, David
Boies, was eating lunch with another hotshot lawyer, Stephen
Zack, when the news came over the television. Boise threw up his
hands and cried, "What possible irreparable harm could they be
talking about?" At that moment, 700 miles to the north, an aide
called Leahy at home and said, "You're not going to believe what
the Supreme Court just did." Just then Leahy's TV flashed the
news. He was speechless. "You got to be kidding," he said
finally. "After this, I never want to hear the Republicans
complain about activist judges."
Americans like to think of the third branch of
government--especially the highest court in the land--as a
bastion against the surgical divide in the country. The voters
couldn't decide between Bush and Gore, and Congress is split
between Republicans and Democrats, but as we groped for a
solution to the election mess, we couldn't help looking to the
courts for a wisdom that rises above the nation's two angry
political camps.
It was a naive hope. Judicial decisions cannot be made inside
some lovely, ideology-free zone--especially when the matter before
the High Court is the outcome of an election in which the
appointment of future Justices was a persistent issue. The
liberal Florida supreme court majority ruled for the sanctity of
counting the votes, throwing Gore a lifeline, while the court's
own chief justice warned that its ruling "propels this country
and this state into an unprecedented and unnecessary
constitutional crisis." Bush allies like Jack Kemp tried to
discredit the court, charging that it had carried out a "judicial
coup d'etat." But then the conservative majority of the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled for the sanctity of the election procedures,
questioning the legality of the recount and bailing out Bush
while the liberal dissenters warned that "preventing a recount
from being completed will inevitably cast a cloud on the
legitimacy of the election."
"It's one more institution divided down the middle," says a Gore
strategist.
The astonishing chain of events--one concussion bomb after another
after another--left the soldiers in both the Gore and Bush camps
dazed and bloodied, wondering when the next explosion would come.
Only Bush and Gore, along with their top lawyers and strategists,
seemed to have had a sense of how the week might go. Since both
courts had handed down key rulings earlier on--the state supremes
extending the timetable for the initial recount, the U.S.
Supremes slapping that ruling back to Florida--Bush and Gore knew
which courts tended to smile on their claims. On Friday night,
Gore told TIME that he was "not all that surprised" by that day's
state Supreme Court decision rescuing him from the abyss. "I had
a feeling from the start that the principle that every vote
should be counted would end up prevailing." But he hadn't
predicted what the U.S. Supreme Court did the next day. About the
prospects for Bush's appeal, he said, "I still have that same
faith."
That night Bush strategist Karl Rove held a conference call with
G.O.P. Senators and told the skeptical and depressed Republicans
that Gore's victory in the state supreme court would be
short-lived. The court had clearly "overstepped" its authority,
Rove said. The U.S. Supreme Court would have no choice but to
lower the boom on the state justices. The Senators weren't
convinced. They worried that the Supreme Court wouldn't move
quickly enough to stop the recount before Gore pulled ahead and
the media announced a new winner. That could alter the landscape
drastically--and permanently.
The next day when the U.S. Supreme Court proved Rove correct, at
least for the short term, no one in Austin or in McLean, Va.,
where the Bush transition team has its headquarters, had the
strength to celebrate. "We're too scarred for that," says an
aide. They felt a whiff of excitement and boatloads of relief.
Dick Cheney was at the movies when the news broke. An aide called
from transition headquarters, and Cheney picked up the call in
the dark theater. He was watching the new Meg Ryan thriller,
Proof of Life.
Perhaps the Gores and Liebermans should see that film, with its
talismanic title, on their next double date. In the Gore camp,
the latest "psychic blow," as an adviser called it, plunged the
Vice President's team back into darkness. They fretted that media
opinion had just been turning their way, that with the call to
count the votes being heeded, Gore would finally look like a
winner. And then the counting stopped. "People aren't in a good
mood," says a senior adviser. "Conventional wisdom can gel
against us."
That may be the least of Gore's problems. No one knows for
certain how the Supreme Court will rule this week, but Justice
Antonin Scalia, in a rare concurring opinion to the court's
Saturday ruling, warned that the "issuance of the stay suggests
that a majority of the court, while not deciding the issues
presented, believe that the petitioner has a substantial
probability of success." That would be George W. Bush. For Gore
to prevail, one of two swing votes among the nine
Justices--either Anthony Kennedy or Sandra Day O'Connor--would
have to peel from the majority that granted the stay, deciding
that the Florida Supreme Court had not changed the rules after
the election or otherwise violated the Constitution, which
confers power over elections to the legislatures. It could
happen. If it doesn't, Gore is out of options. The election will
be over. The war won't.
Last week, before the state supreme court's thunderclap ruling,
it was difficult if not impossible to find a lawmaker on Capitol
Hill who expected Gore to survive. "The coffin was on the ground,
and the dirt was being poured on top of it," says a top Senate
Democratic aide. Publicly the lawmakers still supported the Vice
President, albeit in a mechanical and slightly impatient way.
Privately they prepared for life with President Bush.
Bush finally seemed to be slipping into the new role as well.
With two stunning court rulings in his favor Monday--Leon County
Judge N. Sanders Sauls rejecting Gore's plea for a recount, and
the U.S. Supreme Court setting aside the Florida high court's
earlier pro-Gore ruling--he hoped not just for victory but for
honor. In his best television performance in months, on CBS, Bush
went out of his way to appear leaderly, good humored and generous
toward Gore. "He and I share something," Bush said. "We both put
our heart and soul into the campaign." Message: I won. It's time
for healing.
Bush began phoning G.O.P. lawmakers and asking them to give the
Gore bashing a rest. He instructed Cheney and other allies to
send the same message. The overheated rhetoric had outlived its
usefulness; now it was only stirring up the Democrats and making
it harder for Bush to govern when the time came. He hoped that
Gore allies would be more likely to call for their man to step
down if the Republicans weren't constantly doing so, and he
wanted to smooth the way for the charm offensive he would launch
as soon as Gore made it official--the calls to key Democrats that
had to remain on hold until the struggle was over. "More than
ever, a President-elect has a unique moment to seize," Bush told
CBS on Tuesday. "And I'm going to seize it."
While waiting things out in Austin and at the ranch, Bush has
been deeply involved in congressional politicking. Already, and
almost invisibly, he has his arms around the congressional G.O.P.
in a way his father never managed--a way that could serve him well
if the election ends up being decided in Congress. Bush is
holding regular discussions on legislative strategy with key
allies such as Tennessee Senator Bill Frist, Ohio Congressman Rob
Portman and Missouri Representative Roy Blunt, a conservative
leader close to Tom DeLay. Bush has a team of lobbyists and
consultants--known as the Gang of Six--on call to remind
uncooperative members of Congress where their campaign money
comes from. And Bush has even weighed in on sensitive G.O.P.
leadership decisions, including the selection of new committee
chairmen who would shepherd Bush's legislative agenda, House
aides and Bush advisers told TIME. Rather than choose favorites,
Bush's aides have mostly emphasized that Bush hopes to see
lawmakers who agree with his policies installed as chairmen of
the key committees. Bush allies in Congress have tried to keep a
lid on Bush's involvement to head off charges that he is meddling
in congressional prerogatives.
In other words, when Lieberman traveled to Capitol Hill Tuesday
to rally the troops yet again, he may already have been
outmatched. He met with Democratic Senators in the L.B.J. Room
and received a polite reception, "the kind of applause you give
for people you don't care about," as a Senator described it.
Lawmakers joked among themselves that Lieberman was trying to
prevent someone from "pulling a Lieberman"--speaking out against
Gore the way Lieberman spoke out against Bill Clinton during the
impeachment mess.
At the same moment in the nearby Senate Dining Room, Cheney was
getting a very different reception from the Republican
Conference. There the talk was all about transition, governance
and the legislative agenda--divvying up the spoils of victory.
Alaska Senator Frank Murkowski wanted to know when Bush and
Cheney would roll back Clinton executive orders banning oil and
natural-gas drilling on public lands. (Cheney told Murkowski to
send him a memo.) Strom Thurmond, who turned 98 that day, danced
a little jig to demonstrate that he had no intention of going
anywhere. Both sides were focused on the power-sharing issues
that sprang from the 50-50 tie in the Senate--an even split that
assumed, of course, that Bush would defeat Gore, keeping
Lieberman in the Senate as the 50th Democratic vote, with Cheney
the Republican tie breaker. The even split gave moderates hope
that they alone would hold the key to the President's legislative
success. At times last week, it seemed there were more moderate
groups meeting on Capitol Hill--the Wednesday Group, two Centrist
Coalitions, assorted convocations of New Democrats--than there are
bridge clubs in Palm Beach. Now all that has to be put on hold
while the politicians wait to hear from the judges. "Until this
is settled, nobody is going to be talking about any specific
agenda," says an aide to a moderate Republican Senator. "This
trumps any bill." The healing will have to wait.
By Saturday morning, with the votes being counted by order of the
state supreme court, Bush's directive about softening the
rhetoric had been rendered inoperative. Tom DeLay, the resident
House G.O.P. firebrand, had vowed the night before that "this
judicial aggression will not stand." His operatives were in
Florida, officially to observe the recount process, and House
Democratic leader Dick Gephardt warned them not to "disrupt this
count." But there were plenty of other disruptions.
The state supreme court's ruling was extraordinarily ambitious,
imposing a remedy no one had asked for. Gore's lawyers simply
wanted a recount of 14,000 disputed ballots in two Democratic
counties; the state supreme court ordered a recount of undervotes
in 64 of 67 counties (three had already completed recounts).
Earlier in the process, such a sweeping ruling might have seemed
downright Solomonic--counting the undervotes everywhere removed
the built-in Gore advantage of counting just three Democratic
strongholds. But after almost five weeks of wrangling, with the
hunger for finality beginning to crowd out the desire for
fairness in all but the most devoted Gore partisans, the plan
mostly seemed mind boggling. In fact, the recounts proceeded
smartly, and in many places, Judge Terry Lewis' informal Sunday
afternoon deadline would have been met. Nobody could say with
certainty who would win the recount, but since most of the
undervotes came from Democratic precincts with large
African-American populations and outdated voting machines, Gore's
chances seemed good--and so Bush's lawyers did everything in their
power to shut down the recount.
At first one wondered if Florida's dysfunctional
political-and-judicial world would manage to get it going in the
first place. The state supreme court directed Judge Sauls--whose
ruling they had just trashed--to oversee the recount, but Sauls,
perhaps smarting from press reports about his previous battles
with the high court, perhaps just not wanting to do its bidding,
recused himself. A second judge, Nikki Clark, declared herself
unavailable. So the job fell to Judge Lewis, the level-headed,
mustachioed novelist-jurist who had disappointed the Gore team
with his ruling four weeks ago backing Secretary of State
Katherine Harris. On Friday night, when Lewis held a preliminary
hearing to set a timetable for the recount, Bush lawyer Phil Beck
staged a remarkable filibuster, a meandering, hourlong statement
that seemed designed to delay the counting for just as long as
Beck could string sentences together. Beck, the Bush team's lead
trial lawyer, sensibly pushed Lewis to define the terms of the
hand count--dimples, no; hanging chads, yes? But the judge
declined, leaving the issue to the discretion of the local
counters, and the Bush lawyers to complain, with justification,
that this was a recount without standards. Beck also deserves
credit for adding another fine term to the Election 2000 lexicon.
He repeatedly objected to a manual recount in Miami-Dade because
of his worries about the "spoliation" of the ballots. (Spoliate,
from the early 18th century, means to plunder in war and to
injure beyond reclamation.) Lewis told Beck to put his objections
in writing.
Sixty-four recounts meant 64 county canvassing boards magically
had to appear Saturday morning two weeks before Christmas. Some
election officials were on vacation (Columbia County), or
visiting a sister recuperating from hip-replacement surgery
(Sarasota County), or just returning from Tallahassee and other
court proceedings (Seminole County). Linda Howell, Madison
County supervisor of elections, began the weekend thinking she
would have to sift through her county's 6,642 ballots to find the
31 undervotes. As in most counties, Madison's undervotes had
never been segregated. Some bigger counties--among them Duval and
Hillsborough--were installing computer software to help the
machines identify and separate the undercounted ballots. Duval
County planned to spend 10 hours Saturday finding the 4,967
undervotes lurking amid 291,000 ballots. Then the Supreme Court
ruled, and everyone was told to stop. "I am sick of this," Howell
told TIME Saturday. "We're about 55 miles south of Georgia. I
wish I was in Georgia."
Osceola County officials adopted a lighter attitude. On Saturday
morning, when canvassing board member Mary Jane Arrington held up
a completely unmarked punch card, she turned to a local judge on
the board and said, "You'd think at least they would have voted
for you, Judge." Later an MSNBC news crew covering the board
informed Arrington and her colleagues that the U.S. Supreme Court
had issued a stay. But the board waited for official word before
standing down. "We don't have cable," Arrington noted.
Perhaps the only people in Florida not whipsawed by the competing
state and federal Supreme Court rulings were the Republican
leaders of the Florida legislature. Before the state supreme
court ruled for Gore, Senate president John McKay and house
speaker Tom Feeney--hard-liners closely allied to Jeb Bush--had
already convened a special session to appoint presidential
electors for Bush. Democrats, led by state representative Lois
Frankel, have tried in vain to convince the majority that the
rest of the country would see that as blatant, dangerous
electoral meddling. She redoubled her efforts after the state
supreme court ordered the manual recount, arguing that if the
recounts showed that Gore had won while the legislature anointed
Bush, the legislature's reputation would die in the resulting
train wreck. But McKay told reporters that the legislature's
approach "has not altered"--and of course it didn't change after
the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the hand count. While Feeney and
McKay marched ahead with their plans to continue the selection
process this week, Frankel could be found sitting on the steps of
the Leon County library Saturday, giddy as a schoolgirl because
judges inside were counting ballots. Later that day, as she
walked back to her office in the state Capitol, she heard a
Republican crowd chanting "We got a stay! We got a stay!
Na-na-na-na, na-na-na-na, hey-hey-hey, goodbye!" But the bad
news for Gore didn't plunge Frankel back into depression. "The
word is numb," she says. "I'm not feeling anything." She wasn't
alone. --Reported by Michael Duffy, Tamala M. Edwards, Karen
Tumulty, Douglas Waller and Michael Weisskopf/Washington, James
Carney and John F. Dickerson/with Bush and Tim Padgett and
Timothy Roche/Tallahassee
See time.com for continuing updates on the contested
presidential election
|