 |
Bush bears down
He's better in debates all over the airwaves, and he's quieted
his G.O.P. doubters. But can the front runner go off script?
By James Carney/Portsmouth
January 17, 2000
Web posted at: 11:24 a.m. EST (1624 GMT)
What's the best way to deliver an unpleasant message to George
W. Bush? You say little, and let the evidence speak for itself.
So, just after Christmas, when the Republican front runner
returned to Texas after shaky moments in three debates, he was
handed a tape. It had to be to the point because, as Bush told
TIME last week aboard his campaign bus, "I'm not gonna watch
hours of tapes of myself, and I don't want to rehash all those
debates." But this tape was crystalline in its message: it had
been carefully edited to exclude all the other candidates,
leaving only Bush onscreen with his scripted, repetitive answers
and awkward impromptus. The Texas Governor plopped the tape into
a VCR, watched it alone at the mansion and got the picture. "I'm
a competitor," he told TIME last week. "I want to win. And I'm
wise enough to understand that all of us need to improve in life."
Bush knows a thing or two about self-improvement. He did it in
business, by turning a mediocre career in oil and gas into a
success story in baseball. And he did it again in politics.
Having run just once, and lost, in a 1978 House race, he ousted
a favored incumbent Governor and then won a thumping re-election
four years later. Now he is trying to do it again. After
flubbing a reporter's foreign-policy pop quiz in the fall and
seeming to be in over his head at those early debates in
December, Bush has begun to erase some of the doubts about
whether he has the sure-footedness to be a winning presidential
candidate.
For one thing, he no longer looks like a sure loser in New
Hampshire. Some polls last week even showed him with a narrow
lead over his rival, Senator John McCain. "Before Christmas, the
Bush campaign was in a lot of trouble," says New Hampshire
pollster Dick Bennett. "But they made some changes. The slide has
stopped." And that is in New Hampshire, where McCain has
campaigned almost nonstop for months. (To lower expectations,
Bush aides are predicting that they might lose New Hampshire,
even as they work flat out to win it.) In Iowa, where McCain is
not participating, Bush has maintained a solid margin over
publishing tycoon Steve Forbes in the final week before the Jan.
24 caucuses. And the outlook is even rosier nationally, where a
new TIME/CNN poll shows Bush trouncing McCain among Republicans
by 45 points.
On the campaign trail and in a series of recent debates, Bush
has begun, slowly, to find his voice. He doesn't wait patiently
for his turn to answer questions but jumps in to defend himself
when one of his opponents attacks. And he is no longer too
cautious to take a verbal swing at a rival, as he has proved of
late by gleefully maligning McCain's economic plan of modest tax
cuts and debt reduction as something only a liberal like Al Gore
could love. Aides have also backed off. Rather than grilling
Bush right up until air time before debates and sending him out
on stage rattled, handlers have allowed the Governor plenty of
time to rest beforehand. All in all, the result has been a more
confident, relaxed candidate. "A lot of politics, and of running
for President, is getting used to the process," Bush said in
explaining his change in style. "Man, it's new to me. And I'm
getting used to it."
There is more to the change than that. Faced with a stiffer
challenge than they expected from McCain, political director
Karl Rove and the rest of Bush's brain trust came together late
last month and decided to shift their strategy for the
primaries. Getting Bush to loosen up in the debates was part of
it. Saturating New Hampshire with new 30-sec. ads, to the point
where Bush is outspending McCain in the Granite State air war
more than 3 to 1, was another. But the most critical element was
the decision to simplify Bush's message. Instead of waxing
lyrical about "compassionate conservatism" and running through a
checklist of memorized policy positions every time he speaks,
Bush has tried to hone down his message as much as possible to
just two issues: tax cuts and education. By showing off his
education-policy expertise, Bush hopes to lock in the advantage
he has built over McCain with women voters. And by touting his
plan to slash $483 billion in taxes over just five years, he
believes he can solidify his support among traditional
Republicans, especially those in tax-allergic New Hampshire,
where Primary Day is just two weeks away. "There's a limited
number of notes we can strike in the last few weeks of this
campaign," says a top Bush adviser, "and tax cuts and education
are the two we're gonna strike."
On tax cuts at least, McCain is striking back. Over the past two
weeks, McCain has repeatedly accused Bush of proposing risky tax
breaks for the rich. Bush has fired back, labeling McCain a
timid creature of Washington who would rather see Congress spend
the budget surpluses than give taxpayers a break. At a debate in
Durham, N.H., Bush resurrected his father's broken promise of
"no new taxes" and went him one better, pledging that as
President he will deliver "tax cuts, so help me God." By casting
himself as a supply-side, tax-cutting heir to Ronald Reagan, the
Governor is placing his faith in the idea that Republican voters
are still clamoring for tax cuts, even in this period of
sustained prosperity. "Our current President has done a good job
saying you can't have tax cuts without jeopardizing Social
Security," Bush told 350 New Hampshire residents gathered for a
lunch of baked scrod at the Portsmouth Rotary Club. "I disagree.
I've seen the numbers. There's gonna be money left over."
In keeping with his maverick style, McCain is betting Bush is
wrong about his own party. In McCain's economic plan, the details
of which were released only last week, he calls for a tax cut
roughly half the size of Bush's, with the rest of the budget
surplus used to shore up Social Security and Medicare and to pay
down the nation's $5 trillion debt. That's because McCain
believes that the rank-and-file of his party now care more about
being fiscally conservative and protecting entitlement programs
than they do about getting big tax cuts. And McCain thinks he's
found a big Bush weakness on the issue. "When you run ads saying
you're going to take care of Social Security, my friend," McCain
told Bush at Saturday's debate, "that's all hat and no cattle."
McCain is right when he charges that the wealthy would reap big
rewards under Bush's plan. Outside analysts predict that more
than a third of the benefits from Bush's cuts would flow to
Americans earning more than $300,000. But Bush is right too when
he argues that lower- and middle-income Americans would see
their taxes reduced more, in percentage terms, than the very
rich. A single mother of two earning $31,300 a year would see
her income-tax bill disappear. The benefits of McCain's plan are
focused almost entirely on the middle class--single people and
couples earning between $25,000 and $70,000. For everyone else,
the poor and the rich, the payoff is modest.
Bush and his advisers think McCain's strategy on tax cuts is a
mistake big enough to cost the upstart challenger his chance to
win New Hampshire. "You can't run to the left on taxes in this
state and win the Republican primary," says New Hampshire
Senator Judd Gregg, Bush's state chairman. Gregg may be right
about his home state but wrong about the rest of the country. In
the TIME/CNN poll, Republicans by more than 2 to 1 say they
would rather have a smaller tax cut with more money going to
Social Security and debt repayment than a larger tax cut that
left less money for those two priorities. The results are
similar to ones pollster Bill McInturf found when he tested the
mood of G.O.P. voters in surveys commissioned by the Republican
National Committee in 1998. The RNC filed away the surveys, and
McInturf now works for McCain.
Win or lose in New Hampshire, Bush's biggest long-term asset
against McCain is his ability to rally the armies of the
Republican establishment to his cause. As the front runner began
to falter last fall, the donors, officeholders and interest-group
activists who make up the G.O.P. elite began plotting ways to
prop him up. In Washington, according to several top Bush
supporters, word went out that any defections to McCain would be
treated as a betrayal of the party's best interests. "There was a
clear understanding that you don't screw around with the primal
forces of nature," explains one of Bush's top K Street backers in
Washington. "We've all invested in this guy, mentally, physically
and financially. We want to win in November, and Bush is our best
chance."
In recent weeks, pro-Republican interest groups based in
Washington, such as Americans for Tax Reform and the National
Right to Life Committee, have aired television and radio ads in
New Hampshire criticizing McCain for his stands on
campaign-finance reform and other issues. McCain has accused
Bush of having surrogates do his dirty work--a charge the Bush
campaign has shrugged off as ridiculous. And in New York, where
Bush has the support of Governor George Pataki and most of the
state G.O.P., McCain is suing over the procedural hurdles he
faces trying to get on the ballot for the March primary. "I am
Luke Skywalker headed out from the Death Star," McCain told
reporters last week. "I see the opening, and I see all the
things being fired at us and the explosions all around us."
But if Bush has all the artillery, he has yet to show he can
consistently handle the incoming fire of the campaign trail. When
he is faced with issues that fall outside the Bush Campaign
Message--like when voters at two back-to-back meetings in New
Hampshire last week stood up to ask him about health care--he can
still sound scripted, or just bored. And when the issues are hot,
he can be evasive. On a number of recent controversies--whether
the Confederate flag should fly over the South Carolina capitol,
what to do about the racial profiling of black motorists, whether
to let McCain on the New York ballot--the candidate argues that it
is up to the states to decide. But on subjects less touchy for
Republicans, Bush has been willing to criticize a Cleveland
judge's decision on vouchers, an assisted suicide initiative in
Oregon and an anti-gay initiative in California.
By week's end Bush had found a way to put his best assets on
display. Barbara Bush, the venerated former First Lady, turned
up in New Hampshire, and was followed a few days later by George
W.'s brother Jeb, Governor of Florida. Bush's father, the former
President, flew to Iowa to promise Republicans there that George
W. "would be excellent at doing what I tried to do." As his
campaign bus chugged down a snowy highway in New Hampshire last
week, Bush recalled how, in 1988, he went up to his father to
relay advice from some close supporters. "What is it?" the elder
Bush asked. "Just be yourself," the son answered. As he told the
story, the candidate rolled his eyes, as if to say he had heard
enough of that himself lately.
--With reporting by John F.
Dickerson, with McCain
|