Love at First WonkEveryone says brainiacs Clinton and Barak are made for each
other. But can they cut a peace deal?By Lisa Beyer with Barak
July 19, 1999
Web posted at: 11:03 a.m. EDT (1503 GMT)
Who is smarter, U.S. President Bill Clinton or Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Barak? James Carville, who has served both men,
had to think a minute. "Barak is probably the most unique person
I've met in terms of his range of skills," he explains. "Clinton
is brilliant but nowhere near the mathematician or musician that
Barak is." Then again, Carville notes, the President has
astonishing people skills.
That combustible mix of charm and intellect was on vibrant
display last week as the two men grinned their way from photo op
to photo op, cementing what they clearly hope will become a fast
friendship of mutual interest and political romance. Eager for
breakthroughs in the Middle East peace process, Barak and Clinton
orchestrated a public embrace meant to persuade Israelis that
with a strong ally in Washington they can afford the concessions
new treaties will demand.
In his relations with Clinton, Barak hopes for what his mentor,
assassinated Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, had achieved--direct,
instant and frequent access to the President. In the weeks after
his election, Barak resisted approaches of lesser U.S. officials,
such as special envoy Dennis Ross, preferring to wait for a White
House chat. Nor did Barak want his subordinates running
relations. In a confidential memo, Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright advised Clinton that the ex-general was secretive and
didn't have a large circle of aides "who knew his mind." A
one-on-one relationship with Barak, she said, would be "extremely
important."
Clinton evidently took her words to heart. In their first
session at the White House, he and Barak met for 2 1/2 hours
with no aides present, not even a notetaker--a highly unusual
format. Then the two men and their wives choppered to Camp David
for a sleepover. After a chatty, getting-to-know-you fish
dinner, the two leaders adjourned for a discussion on a range of
issues including terrorism and weapons of mass destruction,
while Hillary and Nava Barak discussed their own shared
interests in women's health issues. Clinton took the couple on a
stroll through Camp David, which figures so prominently in
Israeli history. As he showed them the cabin where the Camp
David accords were negotiated, the two men shared recollections
of Rabin. Shortly after 1 a.m., the party retired, their
friendship cemented and their historic mission clear, locked up
by Barak's assurance that Israel was prepared to make "painful
compromises" for peace.
That was good news to Clinton, who is hungry for a foreign policy
triumph. Barak is also eager for a fast peace, before a White
House change of guard disrupts Washington's ability to facilitate
new deals. Throughout the trip, both sides insisted that Barak's
election signaled a departure from the obstructionist policies of
former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. After the first meeting
of Clinton and Barak, the President told aides Barak was a leader
"who will be scrupulous in terms of living up to his
obligations." The unspoken appendix: "unlike Netanyahu."
The relationship won't be friction free. Barak wants Clinton
close--but behind him, not in his way. He wants Washington to step
back from its role of negotiating and supervising
Israeli-Palestinian agreements. He hopes to deal directly with
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. That makes the Palestinians
edgy. "Barak wants to have a wrestling match without a referee,"
says a Palestinian official. Which is why Washington won't
disengage completely. Explains a U.S. official: "This is a
bicycle in need of training wheels."
Before Barak's arrival, Clinton, expressing his enthusiasm for
working with the Prime Minister, said he felt like "a kid with a
new toy." The idiom translated badly in Israel, where
commentators complained that Clinton was patronizing their
leader. In Washington, Barak came to his new friend's defense.
Now, he said, was not the time to give "tricky interpretations
to innocent statements." Surely there will be plenty of time for
that later.
--With reporting by Jamil Hamad/Jerusalem, Jay
Branegan and Douglas Waller/Washington
MORE TIME STORIES:
Cover Date: July 26, 1999
|