ad info

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 U.S.
 LOCAL
* POLITICS
 election 2000
 guide: gov.,sen.,rep.
 TIME
 analysis
 community
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 SPACE
 HEALTH
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 ARTS & STYLE
 NATURE
 IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 myCNN

 Headline News brief
 news quiz
 daily almanac

  MULTIMEDIA:
 video
 video archive
 audio
 multimedia showcase
 more services

  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:

 TIME on politics TIME CNN/AllPolitics CNN/AllPolitics - Storypage, with TIME and TIME

Bradley, Gore offer subtle differences

By Bill Schneider/CNN

October 27, 1999
Web posted at: 6:11 p.m. EDT (2211 GMT)

WASHINGTON -- Two Democrats, both moderately liberal. What's to choose?

On the issues, there's no big difference of kind between Al Gore and Bill Bradley. But there are differences of degree. After all, they both have long voting records in Congress. Gore served eight years in the House and eight in the Senate. Bradley served 18 years in the Senate.

As Al Smith used to say, let's look at the record.

Abortion: Both candidates are strong supporters of abortion rights. However, Gore used to be more conservative on this issue. As a House member from 1977 to 1985, Gore opposed Medicaid funding of abortions for poor women. Bradley favored abortion rights, including Medicaid funding, throughout his years in the Senate.

Education: Both candidates want to expand funding for public education. Both have plans to recruit new teachers. However, Bradley once voted in favor of tax credits for tuition payments to private schools, and for an experimental voucher program. Gore voted against both.

Health care: Both candidates have offered detailed proposals to reform the health care system and expand coverage. However, Bradley's plan is bigger. It guarantees coverage for all children and offers universal access to adults at a cost of $55 billion to $65 billion a year. Gore's plan would expand coverage for children and working parents without guaranteeing it for all -- but at a lower cost estimated at $10 billion to $15 billion a year.

Economy: Both candidates have supported the Clinton economic program and both favor free trade measures like NAFTA. However, back in 1981, Bradley voted in favor of President Ronald Reagan's budget cuts. Gore voted against them. On the other hand, in 1985, Gore voted in favor of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings bill that mandated across-the-board spending cuts if Congress and the White House failed to reduce the deficit by a targeted amount. Bradley voted no. In 1986, Gore supported a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget. Bradley opposed it.

Civil rights and gay rights: Both candidates strongly defend civil rights, affirmative action and gay rights. Both favor legal protections for domestic partnerships. Both oppose gay marriage. However, Bradley would allow gays to serve openly in the military, while Gore calls for a more compassionate application of President Bill Clinton's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy. Bradley favors amending the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include gays. Gore has not endorsed that proposal.

Welfare reform: Probably the biggest issue difference between the two candidates came on the defining issue for President Bill Clinton as a New Democrat. In 1996, Gore supported the welfare reform bill. Bradley voted against it.

Is one candidate consistently more liberal than the other? No. It varies by issue.

Sure, Gore can drag out old votes where Bradley voted with conservatives on Reaganomics and school vouchers. But Bradley can do the same to Gore on abortion rights and the balanced budget amendment.

In the end, voters are not going to judge these candidates on political correctness. They're going to want to know, "What have you done for us lately, and what are you going to do for us now?"


ELECTION 2000

Gore and Bradley to meet with New Hampshire voters (10-27-99)

Des Moines Register: Forbes objects to content of Bush campaign ads (10-27-99)

MORE HEADLINES


ROTHENBERG

What's at stake in Election 2000
Senate Overview
House Overview
Governors Overview


CANDIDATE BIOS

Quick takes on the White House hopefuls.


CALENDAR

See how quickly the primary and caucus season will take off with this calendar.


WHO'S IN-WHO'S OUT

Who is running, who isn't running and who has already dropped out? Check out our tally sheet.


RACES

If you need to know who's up in 1999 or 2000 and what seats are open launch this quick guide.


POLLS

Check out the latest numbers or dig back into the poll archives.


FOLLOW THE MONEY

How much money have the candidates raised? Here are their quarterly reports to the Federal Election Commission.


'TOONS
Pat goes over the edge

Bob Lang: Pat goes over the edge (10-26-99)

More 'toons


MESSAGE BOARDS

Democratic Presidential Primary


TIME THIS WEEK

In the battle for the ideological heart of the party, Bradley's big-spending ideas put Gore in a box

Gore unleashes on Bradley



MORE STORIES:

Wednesday, October 27, 1999

Search CNN/AllPolitics
          Enter keyword(s)       go    help





© 1999 Cable News Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Who we are.