Modified campaign finance bill being readied for Senate
September 16, 1999
Web posted at: 11:41 a.m. EDT (1541 GMT)
WASHINGTON -- Fresh from a House victory, sponsors of campaign finance legislation intend to submit a slimmed-down bill for Senate debate in hopes they can build support and avoid a filibuster that killed similar legislation last year.
The measure will include a ban on so-called soft money in
federal elections, and include a provision to curb unions' ability
to take compulsory dues paid by non-union members and funnel them
into political activities.
It will not include restrictions on advertisements that attack
candidates but escape regulation because they are presented as
"issue ads" not covered by existing election law. Nor will it
include a requirement for disclosure of campaign finance reports on
the Internet.
"While I support a more comprehensive bill and hope a more
extensive package will eventually past the Senate, I also am a
realist and know that we must not let the perfect bill be the enemy
of real reform," Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) said in announcing a
change in strategy.
Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wisconsin) McCain's partner in the struggle
for campaign finance legislation, said a ban on soft money was
"the bare minimum of reform that we can accept this year." He
added that he and McCain want to introduce legislation "which
changes the dynamic of the situation," a reference to their
failure to overcome past filibusters.
The Senate debate is expected in early October. Republicans have
filibustered legislation in the past, and have threatened to do so
again.
The House approved legislation Tuesday night that contains the
two restrictions that McCain and Feingold will offer, as well as
others. That bill was passed on a bipartisan vote of 252-177, after
a daylong debate during which supporters said it was essential to
reduce the role of money in political campaigns, and critics said
the bill was a violation of free speech.
Hard money refers to contributions that are limited in size,
regulated by the federal government, and which corporations, unions
and certain other groups are banned from making.
Soft money is unregulated by the federal government, and
donations are frequently made in six-figure amounts.
Campaign finance legislation has been stymied in the Senate in
recent years by Republican filibusters. Last year, supporters of
curbs on campaign money garnered 51 votes, slightly more than a
majority but well short of the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster.
Several congressional sources, who spoke on condition of
anonymity, told the Associated Press that sponsors of the measure expect an amendment to be offered in the debate to raise the permissible hard money contribution limits for individuals. These have been pegged at
$1,000 per candidate since campaign finance legislation was passed
in the post-Watergate era of the mid-1970s.
One official added that the amendment might be offered by Sen.
Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican who has been a supporter of the
filibuster in the past, but is viewed by McCain and Feingold as a
potential convert.
At the same time, it was unclear what the impact of the changes
would have on Senate Democrats, who have been united in supporting
the measure in the past.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
 |