ad info

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 U.S. LOCAL
 ALLPOLITICS
  TIME
  analysis
  community
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

 CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
 TIME on politics Congressional Quarterly CNN/AllPolitics CNN/AllPolitics - Storypage, with TIME and Congressional Quarterly

Abortion ban veto sustained

Senate override bid fails

graphic

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Republican-led Senate failed Friday to override President Clinton's veto of a measure banning a type of late-term abortion. The 64-36 vote in favor of an override left opponents three votes short of the two-thirds majority needed.

"Let the baby live," pleaded the measure's main Senate sponsor, Pennsylvania Republican Rick Santorum, as he urged his colleagues to back an override.

Four Republicans joined 32 Democrats to sustain the veto, while 13 Democrats and 51 Republicans voted for the override.

The Republican-majority House voted 296-132 in July to overturn the veto but the Senate's inability to do the same means Clinton's veto stands -- at least until a new Congress convenes in January.

In May 1997, senators passed the bill by the same 64-36 margin as Friday's vote.

Had the measure become law, it would have banned a medical procedure -- described by its critics as a "partial birth abortion" -- except when needed to save the pregnant woman's life. The procedure involves the partial, feet-first delivery of a fetus and the draining of its skull contents,

Santorum
Santorum  

Abortion rights advocates, including Clinton, say the bill is unconstitutional because it makes no exceptions for when a woman's health is jeopardized by continuing a pregnancy -- a provision that they say is required by the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion.

Emotional pre-vote debate

Friday's vote followed emotional debate over why Congress should take the rare step of enacting legislation over a president's objections.

"If the president would have signed this bill, he would have been putting a woman's health and her life at risk," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-California, who led opposition to the override. "So I think he did the right thing."

"If we sustain this president's veto," Boxer said, "there is no one woman in American who has to have this procedure. It is a personal decision. It is a decision based on health."

Boxer
Boxer  

Santorum said he didn't understand that logic. "Why is it healthier for the mother to insert a pair of scissors into the baby's skull, fracturing and shattering that skull inside the mother, causing potential harm to that mother by doing so?" he asked.

"There can be no rationale for destroying this little baby by executing this little baby at that point in time when it is almost born," Santorum said.

He said reports that the procedure is rarely used were "a lie."

Republicans have been trying to enact the ban since taking control of Congress in 1995.


RELATED STORIES

Senate fails to override veto of abortion ban (9-18-98)


RELATED SITES

www.prochoice.org: NAF's Response to "Partial Birth Abortion" Ban

www.prolife.org: Partial-Birth Abortion Information


MESSAGE BOARD

What do you think of the Senate's failed attempt to override the veto?


MORE STORIES:

Friday, September 18, 1998

Search CNN/AllPolitics by infoseek
          Enter keyword(s)       go    help


© 1998 Cable News Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Who we are.