Barnes & Nobleinfoseekad




The Jones Case
 Legal Issues

Related Stories

Judge Orders Jones Case Record Unsealed, Barring Appeal - June 30, 1998

Jones Appeal Difficult, But Not Impossible - April 16, 1998

Jones Will Appeal, Sources Say - April 16, 1998

Jones Set To Meet With Her Attorneys - April 15, 1998


Key legal documents from the case.

Voter's Voice

We've received a ton of e-mail on Paula Jones' lawsuit, and here's some of it. Or join an online discussion on our community page.

Changing Look

Paula Jones has changed lawyers, personal advisors and even her looks. Check out the changes with a JavaScript-enabled browser.

Related Sites

Court TV Online - Jones v. Clinton

Paula Jones Legal Fund Web site

Education and Information Project Web site -- Clinton defense site by James Carville

Full Text Of Jones' Original Complaint



Jones Decision Raises Questions About Starr Probe

Ken Starr

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, April 1) -- Independent counsel Ken Starr's investigation of President Bill Clinton had become entangled with Paula Jones' sexual harassment lawsuit against the president. So how does Wednesday's dismissal of Jones' suit affect Starr's case?

It doesn't, says Starr.

"In January, the attorney general ... assigned us to investigate a variety of matters," said a statement issued by the independent counsel's office. "(U.S. District) Judge (Susan Webber) Wright's ruling today has no effect on our authority, and we will continue working to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible."

But other legal experts believe that Wright's decision to toss the Jones case out of court could have a major effect on the resolution of Starr's inquiry.

"Starr is going to send a report to the House of Representatives, (which) now has to take that report with the full understanding that it's all been very much wrapped up and lashed to the Jones litigation, which a federal district court judge -- a Republican appointee, by the way -- has now said is factually unfounded," said former Clinton White House counsel Jack Quinn.

Starr reacts to the Jones decision
"anxious for a quick resolution.." (Courtesy KATV)
icon 554KB/25 sec. AIFF or WAV sound
- On the merits of the Jones civil case (Courtesy KATV)
icon 389KB/18 sec. AIFF or WAV sound

"In that very real sense, in the court of public opinion as well as in that federal district court, Bill Clinton comes out a big winner and Ken Starr faces a downturn," Quinn said.

Starr has been investigating whether Clinton, or others acting on his behalf, encouraged anyone in the Jones case to lie under oath during depositions or promised favors in return for perjured testimony.

Former White House intern Monica Lewinsky reportedly made allegations to that effect in phone calls to friend Linda Tripp, which Tripp taped and turned over to Starr.

The independent counsel is also believed to be investigating whether Clinton himself gave false testimony during his own deposition in the Jones case. Clinton denied having a sexual relationship with Lewinsky, as she reportedly claims in the tapes Tripp made, and he also denied that he groped another woman, Kathleen Willey, in a room off the Oval Office, as she has alleged.

But with the Jones case dismissed, the question now is whether Starr should, or will, pursue an investigation into possible perjury or obstruction of justice charges stemming from a civil case that has been thrown out.

Alexa Morrison, a former independent counsel, says Starr would be on solid legal ground to continue his investigation, despite the dismissal of Jones' suit. That's because Starr's probe centers on Clinton's alleged conduct, not the merit of Jones' case.

But because it is widely believed that a sitting president cannot be indicted, Starr's primary option would be to send his findings to Congress for possible impeachment proceedings. That would leave congressional leaders with the politically risky option of pushing for removal of a popular president based on actions stemming from a case thrown out of court.

As one legal expert told CNN, "What's the point?"

However, there are other matters that are part of Starr's wide-ranging investigation that aren't entwined with the Jones case.

Specifically, Starr is still looking into the failed Whitewater land deal in Arkansas, which occurred before Clinton became president. Former Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker recently agreed to cooperate with Starr in that investigation.

The independent counsel is also looking into the firings of the White House travel office in the early days of the Clinton presidency.

CNN Correspondents Bob Franken and Pierre Thomas contributed to this report.

In Other News

Wednesday April 1, 1998

Judge Tosses Out Jones' Lawsuit
Jones Decision Raises Questions About Starr Probe
Congressional Reaction Split Along Party Lines
Judge: Jones' Case A Legal Strike Out
'Filegate' Depositions Sought From White House Aides
House Approves $218.3 Billion Highway Bill
Proposed West Virginia Highway Under Fire
White House Supports News Media's Request
Clinton's Attorney 'A Street Fighter'
Starr Investigation Costs Just Shy of $30 Million
White House To Announce Grants To Combat Youth Drunken Driving

Most Americans Support Judge's Decision On Jones' Lawsuit

Judge In Jones' Case Known for Sticking to the Law

Mike McCurry Reacts To Judge's Ruling

Archives   |   CQ News   |   TIME On Politics   |   Search   |   Feedback   |   Help

Copyright © 1998 AllPolitics All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this information is provided to you.
Who we are.