Home
AllPolitics
 

 Home
 News
 Analysis
 Community
 CNN.com

Investigating the President

 Bowles Testifies Before Grand Jury (04-02-98)

 White House Supports News Media's Request (04-01-98)

 Starr Investigation Costs Just Shy of $30 Million (04-01-98)

 Landow Not A Clinton Confidant (03-27-98)

 More Stories...


Transcript

 Ken Starr Discusses His Investigation (04-02-98)

 More Transcripts...


Polls

 Lewinsky Father: Executive Privilege Will Prolong Daughter's Suffering (03-23-98)

 More Polls...


Documents

 Legal Documents Released In The Jones v. Clinton Case

 The Willey-Clinton Letters

 The Julie Steele Affidavit


Video On Demand

 CNN Special: What Do We Know? (03-13-98)

 More...


Voter's Voice

 Starr vb. Clinton (03-24-98)

 More...


Timeline/Players

 A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal

 Cast of Characters In The Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal


Interact

 Community: Debate the scandal on the AllPolitics messageboard.


Search


  Help
Reload often for latest news

Judges Hear Ethics Complaints Against Starr

By Terry Frieden/CNN

starr

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (March 5) -- Claims of ethical violations by Whitewater Independent Counsel Ken Starr were heard Thursday by a panel of three appeals court judges who expressed doubts they should even get involved in the issue.

In an ironic twist, the politically charged court hearing took place at the University of Arkansas law school in Fayetteville where Bill and Hillary Clinton once taught. The hearing attracted a smattering of anti-Starr demonstrators.

The judges heard one of Starr's most outspoken critics, attorney Frank Mandanici, call for them to overturn a lower court ruling that dismissed his complaints about Starr's ethics.

Mandanici told the jurists Starr needs to be investigated and, if necessary, disciplined for real and perceived conflicts of interest. He cited, in particular, Starr's plan to accept a position at Pepperdine University, which is heavily funded by Clinton political foe Richard Mellon Scaife.

Mandanici told the panel of 8th Circuit Court judges that the lower court, which dismissed his complaints about the independent counsel, had "placed Mr. Starr above the law and given him immunity."

Judge Theodore McMillian of St. Louis indicated some sympathy for considering a conflict of interest, but said he wasn't sure Mandanici could bring the case because he had no relationship to the investigation. Judge Arlen Beam of Lincoln, Neb., was more succinct. "We have to decide whether we should be here at all," he told Mandanici.

A lawyer representing Starr, however, claimed the lower court was right when it accused Mandanici of simply being on a personal vendetta against Starr. LeRoy Jahn, a former assistant prosecutor in Starr's Little Rock office, told the court defendants in the case should bring any charges against Starr. She dismissed Mandanici's claim that defendants in Starr's trials are intimidated.

"Susan McDougal on 'Larry King Live' is not the least bit intimidated," Jahn said.

Jahn and her husband, Ray Jahn, played key roles in the prosecution of Whitewater partners James and Susan McDougal and then-Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker.

It was over Starr's objections that the 8th Circuit panel in Fayetteville agreed to consider complaints by Mandanici. The panel is not expected to rule until later this year.

Mandanici is appealing his complaint's dismissal last October by lower court judges in Little Rock. In that grievance, Mandanici accused Starr of real and apparent conflicts of interest, which he says should lead to disciplinary action against the independent counsel.

In an order written by Judge Susan Webber Wright and backed by two other judges, the dismissal said, "In the absence of specific evidence ... this court declines the opportunity to provide Mr. Mandanici a forum for pursuing his vendetta."

Mandanici, however, took heart in a dissenting opinion by Judge G. Thomas Eisele, who said, "Mr. Starr is laboring under the appearance of a serious conflict of interests stemming from the Pepperdine-Scaife allegations."

With that opening, Mandanici argued Thursday that Starr may be inclined to exercise his powers in a way which would satisfy Scaife.

reno

Mandanici insists he is operating on his own and is not a tool of the White House. Mandanici earlier failed in his request to Attorney General Janet Reno to fire Starr for similar reasons. However, the Justice Department's reply letter to Mandanici has taken on increased importance.

The Justice letter to Mandanici said Reno can use the removal provision of the independent counsel law "in only extreme, necessary cases," or it could severely undermine the public confidence in investigation of wrongdoing by public officials.

Since Mandanici's request, House Judiciary Committee