Home
AllPolitics
 

 Home
 News
 Analysis
 Community
 CNN.com

Investigating the President

 Bowles Testifies Before Grand Jury (04-02-98)

 White House Supports News Media's Request (04-01-98)

 Starr Investigation Costs Just Shy of $30 Million (04-01-98)

 Landow Not A Clinton Confidant (03-27-98)

 More Stories...


Transcript

 Ken Starr Discusses His Investigation (04-02-98)

 More Transcripts...


Polls

 Lewinsky Father: Executive Privilege Will Prolong Daughter's Suffering (03-23-98)

 More Polls...


Documents

 Legal Documents Released In The Jones v. Clinton Case

 The Willey-Clinton Letters

 The Julie Steele Affidavit


Video On Demand

 CNN Special: What Do We Know? (03-13-98)

 More...


Voter's Voice

 Starr vb. Clinton (03-24-98)

 More...


Timeline/Players

 A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal

 Cast of Characters In The Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal


Interact

 Community: Debate the scandal on the AllPolitics messageboard.


Search


  Help
Reload often for latest news

Journalists Assess Early Lewinsky Coverage

camera

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, Feb. 18) -- Public opinion surveys show most Americans do not think the media have acted responsibly in their coverage of the Monica Lewinsky controversy. And even some people in the news business share that view.

A group called the Committee of Concerned Journalists has sponsored a study of reporting on the Lewinsky story that shows many journalists abandoned the two-source rule when quoting anonymous sources.

The survey shows, in the first six days of coverage, that:

  • 41 percent of the coverage was analysis and opinion.
  • 25 percent was based on a single named source.
  • 18 percent was based on anonymous sources.
  • Only 1 percent was based on two named sources.

The study, released Wednesday, suggested a growing emphasis on disseminating the latest developments in a competitive story rather than determining their accuracy.

"The media culture today is oriented around talking about the news rather than reporting it," said Tom Rosenstiel, a media critic and vice chairman of the committee.

"The news organizations that had the least facts tended to pretend they knew the most," said Rosenstiel, who has worked for the Los Angeles Times and Newsweek.

rosenstiel

The study examined the nightly newscasts, prime-time TV magazines and specials, selected talk shows, two magazines and the front-page stories of five newspapers to determine the extent to which they relied on unnamed sources or other media to deliver the story. It also attempted to quantify the amount of each account that was based on facts, rather than speculation.

The shows and organizations reviewed were the evening news broadcasts and prime-time magazines, Sunday talk shows and specials on ABC, CBS and NBC; CNN; "Larry King Live" and the "Charlie Rose Show"; Time and Newsweek; the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Washington Times and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
In Other News

Wednesday February 18, 1998

Lindsey Testifies Before Grand Jury
Journalists Assess Early Lewinsky Coverage
Maria Hsia Indicted In Campaign Finance Probe
Jones' Lawyers Respond To Dismissal Motion
Clinton Aides Encouraged By Senate Republican Budget
New Clinton Legal Defense Fund Created
White House Scandal At A Glance
Bill Would Place Strictures on Paparazzi





Barnes & Noble book search

Archives   |   CQ News   |   TIME On Politics   |   Feedback   |   Help

Copyright © 1998 AllPolitics All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this information is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Who we are.