A Flurry Of Activity: Clinton's Second-Term Agenda
By James Carney
WASHINGTON (TIME, Jan. 26) -- The White House has spent the past few weeks rolling out
proposals that the President will feature in his State of the
Union address next week. The highlights:
Balance In 1999
With the deficit shrinking faster than predicted, Clinton
promises to submit a balanced budget for 1999, three years ahead
of schedule
COST: Free, thanks to the economy
PRO: Allows Clinton to look like a fiscal conservative even as he
calls for new spending
CON: Adds to the let's-spend-the-surplus fever already spreading
through Washington
PROSPECTS: A sure bet; House Speaker Gingrich had the idea before Clinton
Expand Medicare
Clinton would allow anyone between the ages of 62 and 64 to buy
into the program early and give those from 55 to 62 without jobs
or insurance the same option
COST: $2 billion to $3 billion in temporary "loans" over five years
if, as the Administration promises, the plan is "self-financed"
by premiums
PRO: Helps ease baby boomers' preretirement anxiety
CON: Could become another budget-busting entitlement
PROSPECTS: Republicans may grumble, but this will pass unless they can
convince the public that it's Big Government again
Improve Education
Clinton will call for more money to hire thousands of new
teachers, build new schools and repair old ones
COST: A total of $15 billion over five years
PRO: Overcrowded classrooms and dilapidated school buildings have
become national issues
CON: An expensive Washington remedy for a problem many Americans
consider to be local
PROSPECTS: With Republicans trying to get right on education, a compromise
is likely
Provide More Child Care
The plan doubles the number of children receiving child-care
subsidies to 2 million and increases child-care tax credits for
lower-income families
COST: $21.7 billion over five years
PRO: It speaks to soccer moms everywhere
CON: Should the feds really be messing with child care?
PROSPECTS: Can you say gender gap? Republicans can't wait to jump on this
bandwagon
Develop the Peace Corps
Clinton, in nod to J.F.K., wants to nearly double the Peace
Corps to 10,000 volunteers
COST: $48 million a year
PRO: Expands a practical program that no longer suffers from the
naive idealism of its early years
CON: Nonessential, so why now?
PROSPECTS: With some prominent corps veterans in Congress, this should
sail smoothly
|