Money Trail Opener

Chronology: Money In Politics

Coffee With The President

Where The Money Was Spent

Was There A Payback?

The Investigations

The White House Defense

Does Everybody Do It?

Running For Dollars

Campaign Law Loopholes

Campaign Sweets

An Experiment In Cincinnati

Is Money Speech?

Poll: Most Say Clinton Acted Illegally Or Unethically

Roadblocks To Reform

Key Terms

Index of VXtreme Video-On-Demand

Related Stories

Let's Go To The Videotape (TIME, 10/13/97)

Campaign-Finance Fight Cools Friendships (CQ, 9/29/97)

In Focus:

Campaign Reform

Gavel To Gavel

Gavel To Gavel: AllPolitics' Campaign Fund-Raising Special Report

Take A Stand

What's your take on the Money Trail controversy?

Related Sites

Center For Responsive Politics

Project Vote Smart

Bulletin Boards

Join a thread, start a thread -- it's your chance to sound off!
Campaign Finance Reform

Senate Hearings On Campaign Finance Reform

Is It Time To Impeach Reno?




Mike Luckovich: Gingrich And Lott In The Finance Muck

Bill Mitchell: Janet Reno's Tempest

Bob Lang: Dems Cash and Carey?

The Money Trail: Democracy For Sale

Big Sugar Contributes Heavily

Industry wants a say in writing farm, environmental bills

By Bob Franken/CNN

WASHINGTON (Oct. 7) -- Machines harvest almost all Florida sugar cane these days. Gone are the field workers and their machetes.

But when Big Sugar wants to influence government policy, it still does it the old-fashioned way: By handing out lots of campaign money to ensure they have a say in writing agricultural and environmental bills.

"Many of the laws are just special-interest payments by the people who have money," said Dexter Lehtinen, an environmental lawyer.

Last year's sugar victory was Section 156 of the farm bill, which guarantees loans "to processors of domestically grown sugarcane" and provides trade restrictions on imported sugar.

One congressman's staff member called it a "bloody fight" keeping the special sugar protections.

No one is required to report the number of meetings between lobbyists and lawmakers. But Capitol Hill sources tell CNN sugar lobbyists conducted "hundreds of meetings" with key House and Senate members in the months leading up to the vote.

In the 1996 federal elections alone, the sugar industry gave $2.8 million to its friends, proving that in politics, nothing is sweeter than campaign money.

On the losing side was a coalition of consumer groups, environmentalists, and the makers of candy and other sweets. They gave about half as much.

They complain the current program costs consumers approximately $1.5 billion each year in higher prices, money that goes right into the hands of sugar companies.

It's a perk supporters fight fiercely to