Official: Spicer misspoke on attack, meant Orlando, not Atlanta

What Atlanta attack is Spicer referring to?
What Atlanta attack is Spicer referring to?

    JUST WATCHED

    What Atlanta attack is Spicer referring to?

MUST WATCH

What Atlanta attack is Spicer referring to? 00:59

(CNN)White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer corrected his contention that a terror attack took place in Atlanta.

He meant to say Orlando, a White House official said Thursday.
Three times in one week, Spicer alluded to a terror attack in Atlanta by someone from overseas.
But the last high-profile terror attack in Atlanta was the Centennial Olympic Park bombing, 21 years ago. And that bombing was carried out by Eric Robert Rudolph, a radical right-wing terrorist from Florida -- not a foreign-inspired terrorist.
    Spicer eventually admitted he misspoke. He appeared to be referring to the deadly Pulse nightclub attack in Orlando last June -- the deadliest mass shooting in US history.
    It was yet another example of a high-profile Trump administration official making statements about a terror attack that never occurred.
    So what exactly did Spicer say about Atlanta?

    The first time

    Here's what Spicer told ABC's "This Week" on January 29 while defending the President's travel ban:
    "What do we say to the family that loses somebody over a terroristic (sic) -- to whether it's Atlanta or San Bernardino or the Boston bomber? Those people, each of whom had gone out to a country and then come back," Spicer said.

    The second time

    The next day, Spicer appeared on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" and also mentioned Atlanta while defending the travel ban:
    "There was a very short period of time in which we had something to execute that ensured that the people of the United States were safe. Everybody's been protected," Spicer said. "What happened if we didn't act and somebody was killed? ... Too many of these cases that have happened -- whether you're talking about San Bernardino, Atlanta ... Boston ... would you wait until you do? The answer is we act now to protect the future."

    The third time

    And in his January 30 press briefing, Spicer once again alluded to an Atlanta terror attack. When asked by a reporter why some countries linked to terrorism aren't on the travel ban list, Spicer responded:
    "Right, and we're reviewing the entire process over this period of time to make sure that we do this right. But I don't think you have to look any further than the families of the Boston Marathon, in Atlanta, in San Bernardino to ask if we can go further."
    Spicer's trio of comments were linked by The Daily Beast.

    At no time

    On Wednesday, Atlanta police spokeswoman Elizabeth Espy said the department is not aware of any recent terror attacks.
    "From what we can recall, the last known terrorist attack in the state was 1996 in which Eric Rudolph was implicated," she told CNN in an email.
    As for Islamist terror attacks, "We have no record of an Islamic attack in the City of Atlanta."
    FBI Special Agent in Charge Steve LeValley also said there has not been an Islamist terror attack in Atlanta. He said the last terror attack of any sort in Atlanta was in 1997, when a lesbian club was bombed. Rudolph, the Olympic Park bomber, also pleaded guilty to that attack.

    That other time

    Last week, top White House adviser Kellyanne Conway also defended the travel ban by citing the "Bowling Green massacre" in Kentucky. But no such massacre ever occurred.
    In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, Conway apologized for shaming the press for not covering the "Bowling Green massacre."
    "I regretted it tremendously," Conway said. "I felt really badly about that."
    The administration's unsubstantiated references to an Atlanta terror attack and the false claim of a "Bowling Green massacre" came after Trump accused CNN of reporting "fake news."
    But Conway doesn't agree with that claim.
    "I don't think CNN is 'fake news,' " Conway told Tapper. "I think there are some reports everywhere, in print, on TV, on radio, in conversation, that are not well-researched and are sometimes based on falsehoods."
    Editor's Note: This story has been updated to include Spicer's explanation.