What Betsy DeVos' grizzlies and guns answer really tells us

DeVos: Grizzlies can determine school gun laws
DeVos: Grizzlies can determine school gun laws

    JUST WATCHED

    DeVos: Grizzlies can determine school gun laws

MUST WATCH

DeVos: Grizzlies can determine school gun laws 00:45

Story highlights

  • Jill Filipovic: Betsy DeVos' absurd statement that schools might need guns for "potential grizzlies'"shows GOP's irrational fealty to NRA
  • She says that reality defeats a sane debate about gun policy -- even about guns in proximity to schoolchildren. Americans deserve better

Jill Filipovic is a journalist based in New York and Nairobi and the author of the forthcoming book, "The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness." Follow her on Twitter. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

(CNN)The latest slogan from the gun lobby: "Use in case of grizzly."

Jill Filipovic
That was education secretary nominee Betsy DeVos's line at her confirmation hearing earlier this week when Sen. Chris Murphy asked her about having guns in schools -- an idea even unpopular with many gun-friendly Americans. DeVos replied that guns may be necessary in some schools, such as in a rural state like Wyoming, where they might be needed "to protect from potential grizzlies." Cue widespread Internet mockery.
What the incident showed, though, isn't that DeVos is foolish enough to actually believe there's a significant problem with aggressive grizzly bears interrupting calculus class. It's that the gun lobby's positions are so extreme, and its influence on the Republican Party so corrosive, that even a rational, honest dialogue -- even a rational and honest-though-heated debate -- about the place of guns in society has become all but impossible. What we have left is absurdist political theater. Grizzlies.
    The American gun lobby has one simple, insane position: guns are good (and perhaps necessary) virtually everywhere. This stance helps gun manufacturers sell more guns, but doesn't do much else.
    Warren challenges Trump's education pick
    Elizabeth Warren challenges Trump's pick for U.S. Education Secretary ORIG TC_00004320

      JUST WATCHED

      Warren challenges Trump's education pick

    MUST WATCH

    Warren challenges Trump's education pick 02:36
    To admit before a nationally televised congressional hearing that perhaps it's not the best idea to place commercial items expressly designed to kill with stunning efficiency in the vicinity of schoolchildren would be to admit that guns are hand-held killing machines, not benign tools occasionally misused by deranged people. The latter is, after all, the position of the National Rifle Association.
    If Devos had made such an admission, it may well have forced the gun lobby and its opponents in the GOP into conversation, and allowed Americans the opportunity to really consider where and when guns are appropriate in shared public spaces. The gun lobby does not want that debate: it cuts into its bottom line and potentially weakens its enormous influence.
    Sanders grills Trump nominee on GOP donations
    Sanders grills Trump nominee on GOP donations

      JUST WATCHED

      Sanders grills Trump nominee on GOP donations

    MUST WATCH

    Sanders grills Trump nominee on GOP donations 01:24
    But it is what the rest of us deserve. In a saner country -- a saner political environment -- answers like the one DeVos gave in refusing to say that schools may be an appropriate place to draw the line on the "guns everywhere" position would be disqualifying.
    Instead, nearly all of the GOP dutifully toes the line on guns, even as gun violence cuts short the lives of thousands of innocent Americans. The NRA and its deputies in the political sphere promote a pervasive culture of fear and a sense that each of us need to be ready to shoot when we suspect potential violence from outsiders. Conveniently, the gun lobby has just the answer.
    It turns out it's not grizzly bears schoolchildren should be afraid of. It's the adults in office who are charged with protecting them but pledge allegiance instead to powerful political interests.