Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what's happening in the world as it unfolds.

Top U.S. military officer: U.S. ground troops to fight ISIS, if necessary

General doesn't rule out ground forces
General doesn't rule out ground forces

    JUST WATCHED

    General doesn't rule out ground forces

MUST WATCH

General doesn't rule out ground forces 03:04

Story highlights

  • President Obama "will not deploy ground troops in a combat role," spokesman says
  • Gen. Martin Dempsey's comments to a Senate panel are characterized as a hypothetical
  • Dempsey said he'd recommend sending military advisers into combat if necessary
America's top military officer raised the specter Tuesday of U.S. troops in Iraq taking on a combat role to fight ISIS, a position that was quickly knocked down by the White House.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that it was possible that U.S. troops advising and assisting Iraq's military could be deployed to fight.
"To be clear, if we reach the point where I believe our advisers should accompany Iraqi troops on attacks against specific ISIL targets, I will recommend that to the President," Dempsey said during testimony before the committee.
Dempsey's comments, which he made several times under questioning by senators, contradicts President Barack Obama's promise that the campaign to defeat and destroy the terrorist group that calls itself the Islamic State would not include American "boots on the ground."
Hagel: We need all resources against ISIS
Hagel: We need all resources against ISIS

    JUST WATCHED

    Hagel: We need all resources against ISIS

MUST WATCH

Hagel: We need all resources against ISIS 01:46
Protesters removed from Senate hearing
Protesters removed from Senate hearing

    JUST WATCHED

    Protesters removed from Senate hearing

MUST WATCH

Protesters removed from Senate hearing 01:07
Congress to consider Syria strategy
Congress to consider Syria strategy

    JUST WATCHED

    Congress to consider Syria strategy

MUST WATCH

Congress to consider Syria strategy 03:47
The contradiction quickly raised a question for the White House: How is serving as "close combat advisers" -- in Dempsey's words -- not a combat role?
Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Oklahoma, the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, pressed Dempsey on the issue at one point in the hearing, asking if pilots dropping bombs in Iraq were part of a combat mission and if the U.S. would rescue any pilots shot down.
Dempsey responded "Yes and yes."
The Obama administration moved quickly to tamp down any suggestion that the United States would deploy combat troops.
Even Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who was seated next to Dempsey at the Senate committee hearing, repeated the President's promise.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest reiterated Obama's position, telling reporters that U.S. troops -- some 1,600 -- in Iraq were serving in advise-and-assist roles, staffing the joint operation centers and defending the Embassy in Baghdad and the consulate in Irbil.
"What he's been very specific and precise about is that he will not deploy ground troops in a combat role into Iraq or Syria," Earnest told reporters.
The Pentagon's spokesman, Rear Adm. John Kirby, characterized Dempsey's statement as a hypothetical, saying on CNN's "Amanpour" that the chairman was speaking about his "best military advice" should U.S. troops in Iraq need to act in an advise-and-assist role with "lower level units."
"If he felt that the strategy as it was being proposed and executed was failing that he would not hesitate to change his advice to the commander in chief about maybe putting advisers in lower level units out there," Kirby said.
"But he also said that he supports the strategy that we are executing right now, and he also said that he doesn't believe we are at that stage right now."
Even so, when pushed during his testimony to expand on his statement, Dempsey told the senators that if the current approach fails, he may recommend the use of ground troops.
The committee hearing came as the House prepares to vote to give the President authorization to arm and train moderate Syrian rebel groups that have been vetted. A Senate vote on the measure would follow.
Manchin: I'm voting no on arming rebels
Manchin: I'm voting no on arming rebels

    JUST WATCHED

    Manchin: I'm voting no on arming rebels

MUST WATCH

Manchin: I'm voting no on arming rebels 04:33
What will it take to defeat ISIS?
What will it take to defeat ISIS?

    JUST WATCHED

    What will it take to defeat ISIS?

MUST WATCH

What will it take to defeat ISIS? 03:36
America's most wanted terrorists
America's most wanted terrorists

    JUST WATCHED

    America's most wanted terrorists

MUST WATCH

America's most wanted terrorists 02:03
The Obama administration has, however, ruled out putting U.S. military advisers on the ground in Syria.
Early in his testimony, Dempsey also seemed to lay out a new version of the administration's mission, saying it was to "destroy" ISIS in Iraq and to "disrupt" it in Syria.
The hearing was interrupted several times by antiwar protesters from the groups Code Pink and Popular Resistance, each of whom chanted and held up signs until they were ejected.
"There is no military solution," one woman chanted. "America does not want war."
The latest CNN/ORC poll shows the American public is worried about the threat of ISIS, with 87% saying they are "very concerned" or "somewhat concerned" about the group. About three-quarters of Americans support U.S. airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and in Syria, and 38% even support putting U.S. ground troops in Iraq or Syria.