Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what's happening in the world as it unfolds.

Judge approves $41M settlement in Central Park jogger case

Innocent man: Hasn't sunk in it's over
Innocent man: Hasn't sunk in it's over

    JUST WATCHED

    Innocent man: Hasn't sunk in it's over

MUST WATCH

Innocent man: Hasn't sunk in it's over 04:22

Story highlights

  • Five men were wrongly convicted in the horrific attack on a jogger in 1989
  • They served years in prison before being exonerated
  • The sensational case polarized New York City along racial lines
  • In 2002, a serial rapist and murderer confessed to the crime and said he had acted alone
A federal judge has approved a $41 million civil rights settlement to five black and Hispanic men wrongfully convicted in the horrific beating and rape of a white female jogger in New York's Central Park in 1989, Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a statement Friday.
The sensational case polarized the city along racial lines and became emblematic of a state of rampant crime. Five minority teenagers, who became known as the Central Park Five, were coerced amid public uproar into making incriminating statements and convicted in 1990.
"This settlement is an act of justice for those five men that is long overdue," de Blasio said in the statement. "We can finally put this case behind us, and these five men and their families can begin to heal these wounds and move forward."
The agreement between the city law department and the five men -- who served between seven and 13 years in prison -- averaged about $1 million per year of incarceration, was reached in June.
One of the men, Kharey Wise, served 13 years in prison. Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Yusef Salaam and Raymond Santana Jr. each served about seven years.
Web Exclusive: 'Central Park 5' attorney
Web Exclusive: 'Central Park 5' attorney

    JUST WATCHED

    Web Exclusive: 'Central Park 5' attorney

MUST WATCH

Web Exclusive: 'Central Park 5' attorney 08:26
The approval of a federal judge in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, where the men filed their civil rights lawsuit, was the final step for the settlement to take effect.
On April 19, 1989, a 28-year-old Wall Street investment banker jogging through Central Park was raped, viciously beaten and left for dead. She would have no memory of the attack.
That same night, a group of black and Latino boys had been in the park, throwing rocks at cars and assaulting people in a practice the media and law enforcement at the time called "wilding."
An investigation led to the arrest of five teens who were accused of rampaging through the park in a "wolf pack" and preying on innocent victims. They were charged and convicted.
The victim, Trisha Meili, kept her identity hidden for 14 years until the publication of her book, "I Am the Central Park Jogger."
Three of the convicted young men had finished their prison terms, one was on parole and the fifth was in jail on an unrelated offense when Matias Reyes, a serial rapist and murderer in 2002 confessed to the crime and said he had acted alone.
DNA analysis later determined that Reyes did rape the jogger and that hair evidence used in the boys' trials did not match.
Robert M. Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney at the time, ordered a new investigation and, on his recommendation, a judge vacated the convictions.
"To the extent that the evidence suggests that these five young men were wrongfully convicted and sentenced to substantial prison terms for a crime they did not commit, that in and of itself constitutes an injustice in need of redress," Corporation Counsel Zachary Carter said in a statement Friday.
But Carter said the settlement "should not be construed as an acknowledgment that the convictions ... were the result of law enforcement misconduct."
"On the contrary, our review of the record suggests that both the investigating detectives and the Assistant District Attorneys involved in the case acted reasonably, given the circumstances with which they were confronted," he said.
"In the end, however, that is an issue that would ultimately be determined by a jury at trial, absent a settlement of this litigation. We have determined that a resolution of this matter is in the best interests of the City."