Texas ex-prosecutor denies wrongdoing in Willingham death penalty

2010: Ex-wife on husband's confession
2010: Ex-wife on husband's confession


    2010: Ex-wife on husband's confession


2010: Ex-wife on husband's confession 00:46

Story highlights

  • Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in 2004 for killing his 3 children
  • Innocence Project asks that prosecutor in 1992 case be investigated
  • Ex-prosecutor: Allegations latest "tack" by death penalty opponents in case
  • John Jackson says he tried to protect informant after case, not coerce testimony

More than a decade after his execution, Cameron Todd Willingham is still a pawn in the debate over the death penalty.

Opponents of capital punishment say Willingham's is a clear case of an inmate being wrongfully executed, while the original prosecutor and state of Texas have been steadfast in their assertion that Willingham should be no one's cause célèbre.

"Willingham was a psychopathic killer who murdered his three children," John H. Jackson, the former Navarro County prosecutor who handled the case in 1992, wrote in an e-mail. "He submitted to a polygraph with predictable results, he confessed the murders to his wife, the trial evidence established two prior incidents when he tried to kill his children in utero by vicious attacks on his wife."

Willingham was executed in February 2004 after being found guilty in an arson that killed his children, 2-year-old Amber and 1-year-old twins Karmon and Kameron. His family has fought to have his name cleared ever since.

The Innocence Project filed a grievance Monday with the State Bar of Texas, asking that it investigate the now-retired prosecutor. The grievance alleges Jackson "fabricated and concealed evidence," including documents indicating that a jailhouse informant received special treatment in exchange for his testimony, which Jackson and the informant both claimed was not true during the original trial.

A story in The Washington Post on Sunday, written by the Marshall Project, a journalistic group focusing on criminal justice matters, said Willingham's case is especially important to death penalty opponents because it could provide the first case showing "conclusively that an innocent man was put to death in the modern era of capital punishment."

'Nathan deserves to face his maker'
'Nathan deserves to face his maker'


    'Nathan deserves to face his maker'


'Nathan deserves to face his maker' 01:01
Victim's father: 'He deserves to die'
Victim's father: 'He deserves to die'


    Victim's father: 'He deserves to die'


Victim's father: 'He deserves to die' 01:12
Perry Mason moment in death penalty case
Perry Mason moment in death penalty case


    Perry Mason moment in death penalty case


Perry Mason moment in death penalty case 00:53
I did the crime...you're doin' the time
I did the crime...you're doin' the time


    I did the crime...you're doin' the time


I did the crime...you're doin' the time 01:36

The story points out that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, in upholding Kansas' death penalty in 2006, said opponents had failed to show a single case in which a convict was executed for a crime she or he didn't commit.

Evidence and testimony at trial showed that Willingham had been involved in criminal activity since his teens and had been verbally and physically abusive with his family. Witnesses alleged that during the blaze, Willingham seemed more concerned with rescuing his car than his daughters.

Appellate courts, including the Supreme Court, declined to stop Willingham's execution, yet in his final words, he claimed to be "an innocent man convicted of a crime I did not commit." Since his conviction, the science employed by investigators to determine that the fatal fire was an arson, as well as a post-conviction claim by his ex-wife, Stacy Kuykendall, that Willingham confessed to her, have been matters of debate.

An alleged alliance

The Marshall Project story reports that informant Johnny Webb, whose testimony was integral to convicting Willingham, now says he lied on the witness stand in exchange for favors from Jackson. The story also alleges that correspondence between Jackson and Johnny Webb indicate the two were in cahoots.

Jackson told CNN the letters are being misconstrued.

In one letter, Webb writes that his testimony against Willingham resulted in retaliation from other inmates.

"Here, the state offered me certain benefits in exchange for my testimony, which resulted in sending a man to death row. This resulted in a murder contract being placed on my head. Because I kept my end of the promise, the state is bound to uphold theirs until my release from incarceration," Webb wrote to Jackson in 1996.

Other documents cited in the Marshall Project report indicate Jackson worked to have the charges on which Webb was convicted reduced, to have Webb released early on a robbery conviction and to have him moved to a less dangerous prison.

In a 1996 letter to a Texas Department of Criminal Justice official, Jackson wrote that Webb should be afforded an "out-of-sequence parole hearing" based on his cooperation in the Williingham case and the subsequent threats against him.

Jackson wrote in closing that incarceration would not aid Webb's rehabilitation and would jeopardize the Willingham conviction. Thus, "Webb's cooperation in the murder prosecution without expectation of leniency should be accorded some consideration," he said.

Webb was granted parole in 1998, but within months was back in jail on drug charges, which constituted a parole violation. In 2000, Webb said in a handwritten letter that he wished to recant his testimony. The Marshall Project alleges the note was never placed in Webb's file or disclosed to Willingham's attorneys.

"I am given no other choice but to make this motion to recant testimony at this time," Webb wrote. "I was forced to testify against Mr. Willingham by the DA's office and other officials. I was made to lie. Mr. Willingham is innocent of all charges."

'Patently untrue'

Reached at his Corsicana, Texas, office, Jackson declined a chance to present his side of the allegations in a phone interview. Despite CNN messages left via phone and e-mail, he said he was "skeptical CNN wants to present my side of the story."

CNN wasn't given a chance to ask Jackson specific questions about the allegations -- namely, reports that numerous fire investigators now say the original conviction was based on outdated arson science and a Marshall Project allegation that a wealthy businessman with connections to Jackson provided Webb money and favors.

'Existing like an animal'
'Existing like an animal'


    'Existing like an animal'


'Existing like an animal' 01:54
'This can't be real'
'This can't be real'


    'This can't be real'


'This can't be real' 01:49
'What you're up against'
'What you're up against'


    'What you're up against'


'What you're up against' 01:16
A love story on death row
A love story on death row


    A love story on death row


A love story on death row 04:56

Jackson did, however, provide a 250-word response to some of the allegations against him.

"The new tack is that I promised the jailhouse witness Webb leniency if he would testify that Willingham confessed," Jackson wrote. "This is patently untrue and I interviewed Webb before others and very sincerely advised him that I could offer him nothing in return for his testimony."

After "supposedly reputable journalists," whom Jackson didn't name, outed Webb as a snitch who had cooperated with authorities, the white supremacist gang, the Aryan Brotherhood, began threatening Webb. There were also efforts by Willingham's defense team and prison guards colluding with the Aryan Brotherhood to coerce Webb to recant, and a journalist even tried to bribe the informant, Jackson wrote.

"AFTER (emphasis Jackson's) the Willingham trial I did everything in my power to prevent his being killed by the (Aryan Brotherhood)," he said. "Webb wrote letters warning that he would be forced to write a recantation because of death threats from the (Aryan Brotherhood) and their stooge prison guard, but that the recantation would be false."

Jackson also alluded in his e-mail to Willingham's ex-wife's claim that Willingham confessed to her before his execution. Indeed, in 2010, responding to the Willingham family's push to have her former husband's name cleared, Stacy Kuykendall told reporters gathered at an Austin courthouse that Willingham admitted setting the blaze.

"Todd murdered Amber, Karmon and Kameron. He burnt them," she said. "He admitted he burnt them to me, and he was convicted for his crime. That is the closest to justice that my daughters will ever get."

She would later tell the Chicago Tribune and The New Yorker magazine that Willingham made no such confession to her, according to their reports.

Arson or no arson...

In his e-mail to CNN, Jackson did not address the arson science used in the investigation, but he wrote in a 2009 guest column for the Corsicana Daily Sun that there was sufficient evidence of Willingham's guilt without the problematic findings in the arson report.

"The Willingham trial has become a sort of cause celebre by anti-death penalty proponents because it seems to be an example of outmoded scientific techniques which led to a miscarriage of justice," he said. "In fact, the trial testimony (the newspaper) reported in 1991 contains overwhelming evidence of guilt completely independent of the undeniably flawed forensic report."

He pointed to seven factors that he said helped establish Willingham's guilt, including his violent past, evidence showing someone had blocked the door's back home with a refrigerator, the "superficial" nature of Willingham's burns and an analysis suggesting Willingham hadn't inhaled excessive smoke, as he claimed, during his rescue attempt.

Little seems certain in Willingham's case, outside the fact that death penalty opponents and proponents staunchly disagree over his guilt. Disagreement has been a mark of the case, as Willingham's own defense attorney told CNN in 2009 that he thought his client was guilty, while one of the jurors who convicted him expressed doubts.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has defended his decision not to stay Willingham's execution, calling him a "monster." Meanwhile, Innocence Project Co-Director Barry Scheck said in the Monday news release that not only should the verdict be called into question, but so should the man who prosecuted Willingham.

"We are asking the State Bar of Texas to investigate and prosecute this matter, which we believe is of profound importance to all citizens in this country. Whether one supports or opposes the death penalty, the execution of an innocent man is, as Justice (Sandra Day) O'Connor has said, a 'constitutionally intolerable event,'" Scheck said.

Jackson has seen his case under fire before, and he stands by the verdict today, just as he did when it was handed down in 1992 and when he penned his guest commentary for the local paper in 2009.

"While anti-death-penalty advocates can muster some remarkably good arguments, Todd Willingham should not be anyone's poster child," he wrote then.

      Death Row Stories

    • There are 61 women on death row across the country, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, making up only 2% of the 3,125 inmates on death row across the country.  Take a look at all the women sentenced to death in the United States.  Source: Death Penalty Information Center

      Lethal injection explained

      As manufacturers cut off supplies of lethal injection drugs, states look for new drug combinations for executions.
    • 371489 07: The Texas death chamber in Huntsville, TX, June 23, 2000 where Texas death row inmate Gary Graham was put to death by lethal injection on June 22, 2000. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Newsmakers)

      Surprising death penalty facts

      An infographic illustrates America's record on executions by race, state, year and method since the death penalty was reinstated more than 30 years ago.
    • orig jag death penalty stats_00002728.jpg

      Executions by the numbers

      More than 14,000 people have been executed under U.S. law. About 3,000 more are slated for execution on death rows across the nation.
    • new dnt botched execution brown_00000904.jpg

      Lethal injection questions

      Clayton Lockett's botched lethal injection and deadly heart attack raises disturbing questions about how the U.S. executes death row prisoners.
    • orig death row stories ep 5 clip 3_00004910.jpg

      Life after death row

      After John Thompson survived 14 years on death row he had to figure out how to return to the world.
    • orig death row stories ep 5 clip 2_00001417.jpg

      Final death warrant

      Death row inmate John Thompson describes his reaction after Louisiana set his official execution date.
    • orig death row stories ep 5 clip 1_00002307.jpg

      'What you're up against'

      A first-time meeting between death row inmate John Thompson and his appellate lawyers yields mutual skepticism.
    • orig death row stories ep 5 clip 3_00005522.jpg

      'I'm like, "Hell no!"'

      Death row inmate John Thompson confronts a proposed shift in legal strategy aimed at saving his life.
    • He coaxes murderers to confess

      Longtime Miami-area homicide detective Marshall Frank has met some really bad people. He reveals three steps to coax killers to confess their crimes.
    • The police notebook

      Why wasn't a key piece of evidence shown to jurors? Can a simple notebook prove a man's innocence?
    • orig death row stories ep 4 clip 1 picture was innocent_00004427.jpg

      'The picture was innocent'

      A retired homicide detective examines the strange case of an ex-cop sentenced to death row for the murder of an 11-year-old girl.
    • 'I didn't do this'

      Joe D'Ambrosio, like many inmates, claimed he was innocent. As he learned, claiming it is one thing. Proving it is another.
    • orig death row stories ep3 p2_00003605.jpg

      'It was a circus'

      Although his conviction was overturned, prosecutors tried to keep an ex-death row inmate locked up before his new trial.
    • 'I always get caught'

      When police questioned an unwitting Gloria Killian after a brutal murder, she used a poor choice of words.
    • 'Nobody cared'

      Well into her 32-years-to-life murder sentence, Gloria Killian met a friend on the outside who was willing to listen.
    • Breakthrough: The letter

      Prison lifer Gloria Killian's defense team finds a previously unknown letter that may help win her freedom.
    • Edward Lee Elmore, 53, smiles after his hearing on Friday, March 2, 2012 in Greenwood, S.C. Elmore, who spent 30 years in prison for murdering Dorothy Edwards, a crime that Elmore said he did not commit, was set free by Judge Frank Addy on Friday. (AP Photo/The Index-Journal, Matt Walsh)

      The fight of their lives

      Legal intern Diana Holt refused to believe that death row inmate Edward Lee Elmore was a killer. So began the fight of their lives.
    • orig death row stories 3_00003213.jpg

      'Are they gonna kill me?'

      Three weeks before his execution date, Edward Lee Elmore asked his attorney a heartbreaking question. Watch her tearful response.
    • orig death row stories 1 _00004604.jpg

      Suspicious student triggers probe

      A law student was sent to meet a death row inmate accused of a horrible murder. Their meeting triggered the beginning of an amazing story.
    • Somalia convicted murderer Adan Sheikh Abdi is tied to a post before being executed on August 17, 2013 by a firing squad in a Mogadishu square for the September 2012 killing of well-known journalist Hassan Yusuf Absuge. Adan Sheikh Abdi was tried by a military tribunal as a 'combatant' for belonging to Somalia's Al-Qaeda-linked Shebab insurgency. He was sentenced to death in March and his subsequent appeal was rejected. AFP PHOTO / Mohamed Abdiwahab (Photo credit should read Mohamed Abdiwahab/AFP/Getty Images)

      Report: Executions rise in 2013

      Virtual "killing sprees" in Iran and Iraq led to a spike in the number of executions globally last year, according to Amnesty International.
    • Death row diary

      Death row inmates deal with demons in different ways. William Van Poyck chose to write.