Skip to main content
Part of complete coverage on

Iranian official on nuke deal: 'We did not agree to dismantle anything'

By Tom Cohen, CNN
updated 6:11 AM EST, Thu January 23, 2014
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • CNN Exclusive: Iranian official says the White House mischaracterizes nuclear deal
  • "You don't need to overemphasize it," Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tells CNN
  • The nuclear agreement took effect on Monday
  • It calls for Iran to freeze part of its nuclear program in exchange for eased sanctions

Watch CNN's full interview with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani Sunday at 10 a.m. on "Fareed Zakaria GPS"

(CNN) -- Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif insisted Wednesday that the Obama administration mischaracterizes concessions by his side in the six-month nuclear deal with Iran, telling CNN in an exclusive interview that "we did not agree to dismantle anything."

Zarif told CNN Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Sciutto that terminology used by the White House to describe the agreement differed from the text agreed to by Iran and the other countries in the talks -- the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany.

"The White House version both underplays the concessions and overplays Iranian commitments" under the agreement that took effect Monday, Zarif said in Davos, Switzerland, where he was attending the World Economic Forum.

As part of the accord, Iran was required to dilute its stockpile of uranium that had been enriched to 20%, well above the 5% level needed for power generation but still below the level for developing a nuclear weapon.

Syria hot topic at day one of Davos
Iran says it doesn't have Bob Levinson
Can Davos solve global inequality?
Davos: Shifting business to the cloud

In addition, the deal mandated that Iran halt all enrichment above 5% and "dismantle the technical connections required to enrich above 5%," according to a White House fact sheet issued in November after the initial agreement was reached.

Zarif accused the Obama administration of creating a false impression with such language.

"The White House tries to portray it as basically a dismantling of Iran's nuclear program. That is the word they use time and again," he said, urging Sciutto to read the actual text of the agreement. "If you find a single, a single word, that even closely resembles dismantling or could be defined as dismantling in the entire text, then I would take back my comment."

He repeated that "we are not dismantling any centrifuges, we're not dismantling any equipment, we're simply not producing, not enriching over 5%."

"You don't need to over-emphasize it," Zarif said of the White House language. A separate summary sent out by the White House last week did not use the word dismantle.

In an interview with CNN's Fareed Zakaria on Wednesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani echoed Zarif's statement, saying the government will not destroy existing centrifuges. However, he added: "We are ready to provide confidence that there should be no concern about Iran's program."

Responding to Zarif's comments to CNN, a senior administration official said "we expected that the Iranians would need to spin this for their domestic political purposes, and are not surprised they are doing just that."

Iranian and U.S. officials have tried to sell the nuclear agreement to domestic opponents in their respective countries who could scuttle it.

Iranian officials have called the interim pact a victory and said it failed to halt the nation's nuclear development program, while U.S. officials say the agreement essentially froze Iran's nuclear program and rolled back some capabilities.

Zarif noted the political pressure facing both sides, which includes a push in Congress for more sanctions against Iran that Tehran warns would destroy any chance for success in talks on a long-range nuclear agreement intended to prevent development of an Iranian nuclear weapon.

"All of us are facing difficulties and oppositions and concerns and misgivings," he said, noting he had been summoned Wednesday to Iran's parliament to answer questions.

Asked about his relationship with Secretary of State John Kerry, Zarif called it "very difficult because we're both going into these negotiations with a lot of baggage."

Progress has been made, he said, but "it's yet too early to talk about trust."

Zarif and Rouhani traveled to Switzerland for annual gathering of world political and business leaders in Davos as a new round of Syrian talks started in Montreux before moving to Geneva.

Iran, a major backer of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, was invited to the Syrian talks by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, then disinvited under pressure from the United States because Tehran refused to endorse conditions in a previous agreement setting up the talks.

"We do not like the way Iran was treated," he said, adding "it did not enhance the credibility of the United Nations or the office of the Secretary General."

EXCLUSIVE: Medvedev on Sochi, Syria
The curtain goes up on Davos
U.N.: Iran not attending Syria peace talks
Nina dos Santos meets Goldie Hawn. Nina dos Santos meets Goldie Hawn.
Davos: Behind the scenes
HIDE CAPTION
<<
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
>
>>
Davos: Behind the scenes Davos: Behind the scenes

Zarif expressed hope that the Syrian talks could succeed, but he criticized Syrian opposition groups and their supporters that opposed Iran's participation in the talks for what he called spreading extremism and trying to impose their will on the Syrian people.

He explained Iran's support for the Syrian government, a longtime ally, by saying "Iran finds itself in a situation where we see the very prominent and serious danger of terrorism, extremism, sectarian tension being fed from outside and creating a very dangerous environment in Syria."

To Zarif, an agreement among Syrians that brings a democratically elected government is the only solution, and he dismissed concerns that a free and fair vote would be impossible with al-Assad in power and running as a candidate.

Kerry said earlier Wednesday in Montreux that there was "no way" al-Assad will be part of a transitional government sought by the Geneva talks.

"Why don't we talk about it?" Zarif asked. "And why don't we allow the Syrians to talk about how they can conduct a free and fair election? Why do people need to set an agenda and impose their agenda on the Syrian people?"

Sciutto also asked Zarif about his visit last week to lay a wreath at the grave of Hezbollah leader Imad Mugniyah in Lebanon.

The United States condemned the gesture, saying Mugniyah was "responsible for heinous acts of terrorism that killed hundreds of innocent people, including Americans," said a statement by National Security Council spokesperson Caitlin Hayden.

Zarif responded that his visit should be seen in the same context as the U.S. delegation that attended the recent funeral of Ariel Sharon, the former Israeli leader who was defense minister when mass killings occurred at refugee camps under his command in 1982.

"It's a decision based on national perceptions and national beliefs," he said, describing Mugniyah as a revered figure for resisting Israeli occupation while calling Sharon responsible for the massacre of Palestinians and Lebanese in the Sabra and Shatila camps.

"I believe Sabra and Shatila were crimes against humanity," Zarif said.

Democracy: Egypt's beautiful dream in the wrong hands
Opinion: Will global elite listen to Pope of poor?
Can Davos make a difference to global inequality?
Opinion: Tunisia's leaders have failed the Dignity Revolution

CNN Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Sciutto reported this story from Davos, Switzerland. It was written by CNN's Tom Cohen in Washington. CNN's Faith Karimi, Reza Sayah and Kevin Liptak contributed to this report.

ADVERTISEMENT
Part of complete coverage on
Iran nuclear deal
updated 5:40 AM EST, Thu December 26, 2013
Iranian lawmakers have drafted a bill that would force the government to enrich uranium up to 60% if new sanctions are imposed.
updated 4:31 PM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
Diplomats made history when Iran and six world powers came together on an agreement over Iran's nuclear program.
updated 11:35 AM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
The White House issued a detailed synopsis, or "fact sheet," of the six-month deal regarding Iran's nuclear program.
updated 9:45 PM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
A quick primer to get you up to speed on where we are and how we got there.
updated 8:37 AM EST, Mon November 25, 2013
The deal struck at the weekend is a step forward in the budding rapprochement between Iran and the U.S.
updated 10:59 AM EST, Mon November 25, 2013
While the EU and the U.St. cheered a deal that world powers reached with Tehran over its nuclear ambitions, Israel was fierce in its criticism.
updated 11:38 AM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
These are troubled times for President Barack Obama.
updated 11:19 PM EST, Sat November 23, 2013
U.S. President Barack Obama vows to "ratchet up the pressure" if Iran violates the nuclear deal.
updated 11:26 PM EST, Sat November 23, 2013
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says he hopes deal with improve Iran's relations with Western powers.
updated 8:51 AM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
Click through our gallery for an overview of how enriched uranium is made.
More than two dozen countries have nuclear power, but only a few have nuclear weapons or are suspected of pursuing nuclear weapons.
updated 11:19 AM EST, Tue November 19, 2013
Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey as well as Israel all fear Iran gaining nuclear status, writes Barak Seener.
updated 7:04 PM EST, Sat November 16, 2013
Russia's foreign minister says the opportunity to bring about an end to a decade-long standoff is one that must not be passed up.
ADVERTISEMENT