Skip to main content

Married same-sex couple awaits ruling on federal benefits

By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer
updated 9:05 AM EDT, Wed June 26, 2013
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Court to rule on Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
  • It defines marriage as between one man, one woman
  • Same-sex couples not able to receive federal perks for married
  • Debate is over role of federal government in the issue

(CNN) -- The wedding photo shows the happy couple poised to kiss, ready to begin an adventure that has now taken them to the U.S. Supreme Court.

For Karane and Jamelle Thomas-Williams, this is a fight for recognition by the federal government of their legal same-sex union, part of a landmark constitutional appeal over same-sex marriage and "equal protection." Their love has united them, but the larger social issue has split the country for more than four decades.

Rulings in that and a related appeal over state marriage laws are expected from the high court Wednesday.

The Washington, D.C., couple were legally married last October -- but not in the eyes of some of their employers or elected leaders.

NFL player fights for same-sex marriage
Same-sex marriage on trial
Chief justice: Obama lacking 'courage'
Battle over same-sex marriage

Karane serves her community as a Metropolitan Police officer. Jamelle serves her country in the U.S. Air Force Reserve. But since she is a federal worker, the couple cannot share the 1,000-plus federal perks enjoyed by married heterosexuals -- joint tax returns, loan programs for veterans, and survivor, pension, bankruptcy, family medical leave and health insurance benefits.

Under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed in 1996, marriage is defined for federal purposes as between one man and one woman. That means the estimated 120,000 gay and lesbian couples legally married in nine states and the District of Columbia are still considered -- in the eyes of DOMA opponents -- the equivalent of girlfriend and boyfriend.

CNNMoney.com: Big money at stake in same-sex marriage ruling

"As a federal employee and as an airman, you get a constant reminder that you're second class," Jamelle told CNN. "I had to list Karane as my sister just so that someone would call her in the event that I'm killed or missing in action, or I'm hurt on the job. She can't be my emergency contact, she can't receive my remains. As far as my death benefit, I had to list her as 'other.'"

Adding to the confusion is Karane's status as a D.C. government employee. She enjoys the benefits of her relationship with Jamelle because her local government in the nation's capital recognizes same-sex marriage.

"But once we step outside of D.C., it's a whole other ballgame," said Karane. In neighboring Virginia, which does not recognize their marriage, the couple says they are viewed as "legal strangers."

The woman at the center of the case

What is federal government's role in defining marriage?

The larger debate over DOMA's intent and impact 17 years after passage has driven a wedge between the executive and legislative branches.

At issue is what role the federal government should play when it comes to marriage -- something states have traditionally controlled.

Challenging DOMA: 5 things we learned

"What the court is being asked to decide is whether or not Congress can pass a law that treats same-sex couples, who are already married under the laws of their state, different from opposite-sex couples," said Amy Howe, a leading appellate attorney and editor of SCOTUSblog.com.

Four federal district courts and two appeals courts have already struck down the law's restrictive benefits provision. And in a rare move, the Obama administration also abandoned its defense of congressional authority, saying DOMA is unconstitutional.

That has left House Republicans in the unconventional position of stepping in to argue it should stay in place, at least for now.

Traditionally, the role of defending federal law would fall to the U.S. solicitor general's office. But President Barack Obama, in an election-year stunner, said last May he now supported same-sex marriage. The president had already ordered Attorney General Eric Holder not to defend DOMA.

That raised the question of whether any party could rightfully step in and defend the law.

Justices could put an end to hard choice for gay couples

Besides the constitutional issue, the justices had specifically ordered opposing sides to argue a supplemental question: whether congressional Republicans -- operating officially as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives -- have "standing" or legal authority to make the case.

"Let's not confuse the issue of DOMA and the administration's decision that it was unconstitutional," House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, told CNN. "It is not their role to decide what's constitutional. DOMA was a law that was passed by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Clinton. In our system of government, the administration doesn't get to decide what's constitutional -- the Supreme Court does. And our financing the lawsuit was to make sure the proper forum was used to make sure that we know what's constitutional and what isn't."

Supporters of traditional marriage agree.

"DOMA's important because Congress said it's important," said Austin Nimocks, senior counsel at the legal ministry Alliance Defending Freedom. "We sent our elected representatives to Washington, D.C., and they chose to say that marriage is one man and one woman for purposes of federal law."

And many conservatives argue the courts should stay out of the larger constitutional issues and let citizens and the legislatures hash it out. Some activists worry nine unelected justices will issue a sweeping 50-state mandate and redefine marriage as whatever personal bond they now think it is.

Carrie Severino, chief counsel of the Judicial Crisis Network, says nothing in the Constitution tells states whether and how they should "evolve" on such an established institution. She said liberty is fundamental right, but that government also has broad discretion to affirm the idea marriage is mainly about ensuring biological children are raised in a stable two-parent family with a mother and father.

Same-sex marriage in the 21st century "is clearly not what anyone understood as marriage at the time of the framing of the Constitution," she told CNN, saying that should be enough to keep the high court out of the current case.

Gay couple fights for right to marry in epic high court case

Lack of protections, benefits if partner deploys

Jamelle and Karane said they hit it off immediately after they met by chance at a downtown club's Ladies Night, and felt like they had known each other forever. They were together four years before marrying last October.

Karane said she went to Jamelle's mother first to ask her daughter's hand in wedlock. Sitting in their comfortable Washington home, they appear blissfully happy being together, but DOMA has put unexpected strains on the marriage because of "little frustrations." For one thing, they worry what could happen when Jamelle gets sent overseas in a war zone.

"Technically, I am a single person deploying," she said. "So I don't have any protection for my family. I could deploy tomorrow and there would be nothing in place to help my family. It would be just me. So that's definitely scary. Financially, making sure that the responsibility that we have to each other and to our families is taken care of, and it would be like I'm leaving Karane in a lurch."

Karane added: "It's like we have to still go above and beyond just to get to where heterosexual couples already are."

They believe they are burdened by a triple social stigma -- as women, black and lesbians.

The couple hopes to have children someday, but that would create further layers of what they say are discriminatory rules. For now this self-described "boring couple" say they look forward to the day their children would be born and raised in a post-DOMA world.

But regardless how the Supreme Court rules, they say they will persevere.

"I should be able to walk with my wife hand in hand and live our life. We shouldn't have to sit here on the edge of our seats, waiting for a decision," said Karane. "Are we going to finally be able to just be recognized without any strings attached?... We're humans, we live in a strange society, and we have to work with what we've got."

Kevin has a family: A same-sex couple's remarkable journey

CNN's Joe Johns and Stacey Samuel contributed to this report.

ADVERTISEMENT
Part of complete coverage on
Same-sex marriage debate
updated 10:54 AM EDT, Fri March 28, 2014
The federal government will recognize gay marriages in Michigan that occurred between recent conflicting court rulings, Attorney General Eric Holder announced.
updated 8:37 AM EST, Thu February 27, 2014
A federal judge struck down Texas' same-sex marriage ban, thanks to a sweeping decision holding that its current prohibition has no "legitimate governmental purpose."
updated 5:46 PM EST, Thu February 27, 2014
Arizona's divisive SB1026 -- which supporters claim protected religious freedom, and critics say served as cover for businesses to discriminate against gays and lesbians -- didn't come from nowhere.
updated 12:24 AM EST, Fri February 14, 2014
A federal judge in Virginia has struck down the commonwealth's ban on same-sex marriage as unconstitutional, according to court documents.
updated 4:23 PM EST, Wed February 12, 2014
gay couple health insurance jeff jones and Nate Walker
A federal judge ruled that Kentucky's denial of recognition for same-sex marriages violates the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law.
updated 2:46 PM EDT, Fri August 2, 2013
Legally married same-sex spouses seeking U.S. visas will now be treated the same as opposite-sex spouses, Secretary of State John Kerry announced.
updated 9:45 AM EDT, Thu August 1, 2013
They've been a couple for two years and are eager to raise two children together. But it wasn't until Thursday that Holli Bartelt and Amy Petrich were allowed to legally wed.
updated 8:26 AM EDT, Thu June 27, 2013
The Supreme Court has struck down a key part of congressional law that denies to legally married same-sex couples the same benefits provided to heterosexual spouses.
updated 8:27 AM EDT, Thu June 27, 2013
The ruling permits same-sex couples in California to legally marry.
updated 9:31 AM EDT, Thu June 27, 2013
More than 50 years ago, military brass sat down the couple who'd become Susan Green's parents.
updated 8:04 AM EDT, Thu June 27, 2013
Thousands of same-sex couples across the U.S. were thrilled by the rulings. But in 37 states, some same-sex couples weren't as happy as they'd hoped to be.
updated 3:31 PM EDT, Sat June 29, 2013
A Hollywood genius might have been hard-pressed to produce a more perfect ending to Melanie Servetas' story.
Find out which states match your values when it comes to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights.
updated 12:05 PM EDT, Tue April 15, 2014
Here's a look at what you need to know about same-sex marriage in the U.S. and worldwide.
updated 3:39 PM EDT, Thu August 29, 2013
Same-sex marriage is in the spotlight on the national legal and political stages. Read what's behind the two landmark cases.
Which states allow same-sex marriage, and which states don't?
updated 8:18 PM EDT, Tue June 25, 2013
11-year-old Kevin thought it would be neat if daddy and papa tied the knot on the same day the couple met 15-years earlier on a softball field.
updated 10:58 AM EST, Sat January 19, 2013
Gail Dosik walked into a party, hung up her coat and fell in love; 26 years later, she was finally able to make the beautiful stranger she met that night her legally wedded wife.
updated 4:21 PM EDT, Thu June 7, 2012
On her wedding day, Jessica Port wore a tan and black dress to match the tan button-down shirt and patterned necktie of her spouse-to-be, Virginia Anne Cowan.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT