Why shoe throwing is 'incredibly offensive'

Shoe hurled at Ahmadinejad in Cairo
Shoe hurled at Ahmadinejad in Cairo


    Shoe hurled at Ahmadinejad in Cairo


Shoe hurled at Ahmadinejad in Cairo 02:21

Story highlights

  • Throwing a shoe is offensive "regardless of the religious practices," professor says
  • "The bottom line is a shoe is dirt," says CNN Iraq producer Mohammed Tawfeeq
  • Some Iraqis celebrated when a reporter threw his shoe at President Bush in 2008
  • Psalm 60:8 offers evidence shoe throwing is an ancient insult

The shoe attack on Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Egypt, the latest on a politician in the Middle East, causes many in West to ask: Why is throwing a shoe such a big deal?

One of CNN's resident experts is producer Mohammed Tawfeeq, who was in Baghdad when President George W. Bush dodged a flying shoe at news conference in the U.S. Embassy in December 2008.

Journalist Muntadhar al-Zaidi tossed it because he wanted to "humiliate the tyrant," his brother told CNN.

"Yes, I was there," Tawfeeq said. "It was a very big deal in Iraq."

Read more: Iraqi artist inspired by George W Bush shoe thrower

In fact, some Iraqis celebrated that moment, he said.

"Other people were not happy because for them they see it -- by end of the day -- like a guest visiting their country," Tawfeeq said. "Traditionally, it was also offensive to insult a guest."

Watch man hurl shoe at Iran's president
Watch man hurl shoe at Iran's president


    Watch man hurl shoe at Iran's president


Watch man hurl shoe at Iran's president 01:04
2008: Shoes thrown at President Bush
2008: Shoes thrown at President Bush


    2008: Shoes thrown at President Bush


2008: Shoes thrown at President Bush 01:05

The act of throwing a shoe at someone or showing them your sole is "incredibly offensive" in the Middle East, he said.

"The bottom line is a shoe is dirt," he said. "Throwing a shoe on someone means throwing dirt on that person."

Professor Faegheh Shirazi, with Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Texas, agreed, saying it is offensive "regardless of the religious practices."

"Throwing a shoe or hitting someone with a shoe or showing the bottom of your shoe when sitting with legs up on a chair and facing another person all are culturally unacceptable and are considered to be a grave insult and belittling to a person," Shirazi said.

Another offensive aspect is the significance of the shoe being a sign of wealth.

"Most often, lower-status people and poor men could not wear shoes," Shirazi said. "The feet came in contact with pollution and the dirt on the road. The dirt on the feet indicated the lack of social status, the level of economic class and the level of education and lack of sophistication and intellect."

Tawfeeq, who occasionally visits the United States, was surprised to learn shoe throwing was not considered an offense in North America.

A search of literature reveals references suggesting the power of the shoe is ancient.

For example, in the King James Version of the Old Testament, Psalm 60:8 says: "Moab is my washpot; over Edom will I cast out my shoe: Philistia, triumph thou because of me."

"Perhaps it has to do with the hierarchy of the body position, that is, the relationship between the head and the feet, the head being at the top and not touching the ground and the dirt," Shirazi said. "The head carries a more prestigious status in comparison to the feet, which in older times mostly remained bare."

      CNN Recommends

    • pkg clancy north korea nuclear dreams_00002004.jpg

      North Korea nuclear dream video

      As "We are the World" plays, a video shows what looks like a nuclear attack on the U.S. Jim Clancy reports on a bizarre video from North Korea.
    • Photos: Faces of the world

      Photojournalist Alison Wright travelled the world to capture its many faces in her latest book, "Face to Face: Portraits of the Human Spirit."
    • pkg rivers uk football match fixing_00005026.jpg

      How to fix a soccer match

      Europol claims 380 soccer matches, including top level ones, were fixed - as the scandal widens, CNN's Dan Rivers looks at how it's done.
    • No Eiffel Towers, Statues of Liberties, Mt. Rushmores, Taj Mahals, Aussie koalas or Chairman Maos.

      15 biggest souvenir-buying no-no's

      It's an essential part of any trip, an activity we all take part in. Yet almost none of us are any good at it. Souvenir buying is too often an obligatory slog.