Crowley: JPMorgan shakes up Wall Street and Capitol Hill

Jamie Dimon is the chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase.

Story highlights

  • JPMorgan Chase lost $2 billion in hedge fund trading
  • CEO Jamie Dimon has been leading opponent of today's tighter regulations
  • His fight to loosen regulations has been damaged, Candy Crowley observes

JPMorgan Chase announced last week that it lost $2 billion as the result of some complicated trades intended to hedge against economic risk, which according to its top executive is apparently not as bad as it sounds.

"This is a stupid thing we should never have done, but we are still going to earn a lot of money this quarter. It's not like this company is jeopardized -- we hurt ourselves and our credibility, yes, and we've got to fully expect that and pay the price for that," CEO Jamie Dimon said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday.

Explain it to me: How did JPMorgan lose that much money?

To be perfectly clear, JPMorgan did not lose taxpayer money. It lost its own money. Still, the news shook up Wall Street and Capitol Hill with bad flashbacks.

"Well, this is a big surprise because this particular bank is well-respected. It is well-led. And so, to have this kind of a loss from hedging activities is a big surprise," Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, said on "Fox News Sunday." "I think what it points out that there are no rules of the road for hedging and for derivatives. And this needs to happen."

After the meltdown three years ago that nearly took the country over a cliff, Congress passed Dodd-Frank, a regulatory law to rein in risky investments and prevent the need for future government bailouts.

Capitol Hill reacts to JPMorgan's loss
Capitol Hill reacts to JPMorgan's loss

    JUST WATCHED

    Capitol Hill reacts to JPMorgan's loss

MUST WATCH

Capitol Hill reacts to JPMorgan's loss 02:25
PLAY VIDEO
JPMorgan's $2 billion loss, missteps
JPMorgan's $2 billion loss, missteps

    JUST WATCHED

    JPMorgan's $2 billion loss, missteps

MUST WATCH

JPMorgan's $2 billion loss, missteps 01:28
PLAY VIDEO
What should happen to JPMorgan's CEO?
What should happen to JPMorgan's CEO?

    JUST WATCHED

    What should happen to JPMorgan's CEO?

MUST WATCH

What should happen to JPMorgan's CEO? 03:42
PLAY VIDEO
Getting things done in Washington
Getting things done in Washington

    JUST WATCHED

    Getting things done in Washington

MUST WATCH

Getting things done in Washington 03:22
PLAY VIDEO

Writing the regulations has been a ferocious battle, particularly over something called the Volcker Rule, after former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. It would ban banks from trading with their own funds.

Worried about damaging the industry's ability to protect itself and hurting the recovery, the Treasury Department, Republicans and Wall Street have been trying to water it down.

Dimon, a kind of a shining light in the industry, is a leading opponent of the Volcker Rule. Or has been until maybe now.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, told "Meet the Press" that the price to be paid "will be that they will lose their battle in Washington to weaken the rule. That is the real price."

If Dimon has lost his voice, Republicans have not.

"Bear in mind, the Dodd-Frank bill, 2,300 pages, they've already had 400 rule-making sessions, and this is where you have so much government regulation coming in that you can't see the forest for the trees," Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee, said on ABC's "This Week."

It is, as talking head after talking head conceded, very complicated.

But not all of it.

"In how we manage that portfolio, we did lose $2 billion trading. In hindsight, we took far too much risk," Dimon said. "The strategy we had was barely vetted. It was barely monitored. It should never have happened."

Unfortunately, the part that is clear is not reassuring.

      Election 2012

    • CHICAGO, IL - NOVEMBER 06:  U.S. President Barack Obama stands on stage with first lady Michelle Obama, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and Dr. Jill Biden after his victory speech on election night at McCormick Place November 6, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. Obama won reelection against Republican candidate, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

      Obama makes history, again

      A black man is returning to the White House. Four years ago, it was a first, the breaking of a racial barrier. Tuesday night, it was history redux. And more.
    • CHICAGO, IL - NOVEMBER 06:  U.S. President Barack Obama stands on stage after his victory speech at McCormick Place November 6, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. Obama won reelection against Republican candidate, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

      Five things we learned

      The 2012 presidential election shattered spending records, further polarized a divided country and launched a thousand hashtags.
    • Demanding more from second term

      Even though voters indicated to pollsters that their financial situation is the same or worse than it was four years ago, they put their trust in the president.
    • US President Barack Obama addresses a crowd of supporters on stage on election night November 6, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. President Barack Obama swept to re-election Tuesday, forging history again by transcending a slow economic recovery and the high unemployment which haunted his first term to beat Republican Mitt Romney. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad        (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

      Victorious Obama faces challenges

      The president faces a long and familiar set of challenges after riding a wave of support from moderates, women and minorities to victory.
    • GOP retains grip on House

      Republicans kept a lock on the U.S. House of Representatives, a crucial victory after the party failed to wrest away the presidency from Barack Obama and the Senate from the Democrats.