Santorum was debate's real winner

Former Sen. Rick Santorum scored strongly at Thursday night's CNN South Carolina Republican debate, says Todd Graham.

Story highlights

  • Todd Graham: Rick Santorum had the best night of any of the debaters in any of debates
  • In last place in polls, with no one attacking him, he laid into opponents, Graham says
  • Calling Gingrich "loose cannon," Santorum hit him on issues, tenure as speaker, he says
  • Graham: Question on Gingrich marriage a mistake, gave Gingrich a chance to slam media

If I were a conservative Republican in South Carolina and Thursday night's debate was the first I'd watched during this primary season, the choice would be easy. Rick Santorum. I know: It surprised me, too.

While he might have fewer overall followers than the other three candidates, Santorum nonetheless (or because of this) debated flawlessly. It was the single most impressive debate performance in this long series from any of the candidates.

Newt Gingrich also had his moments, pulling out whatever "go-to" trick in his arsenal the moment required. But on the issues, and for conservative Republican South Carolina voters, Santorum was the one running on all cylinders.

Here's why he did so well:

First, nobody was attacking him. He had a free roll. So in this case, it paid for Santorum to be last in the polls. He attacked Mitt Romney and Gingrich and was never put on his heels by his opponents. With no predators in sight, Santorum dominated the environment like an Asian carp.

Todd Graham

Second, his criticisms were focused and covered important conservative issues. He hammered away on health care at both Romney. (At one point Romney actually made the error of calling his own plan "Romneycare." Next thing you know he will accidentally call it "Obamneycare.") And then Santorum laid into Gingrich on individual mandates, which the former House speaker supported for 10 years.

More than once, Santorum drove home the notion that Gingrich is a loose cannon and Republicans can't afford that in a nominee. He flatly stated that Gingrich has "no discipline." Gingrich had suggested earlier that Santorum should drop out of the race. "These are not cogent thoughts," Santorum responded in the debate, reminding the audience that he is "2 and 0" against Gingrich in both Iowa and New Hampshire, and with much less money.

And Santorum provided the first debate attack of Gingrich's leadership as speaker of the House. "I served with him. I was there. I knew what the problems were going on in the House of Representatives, and Newt Gingrich was leading this."

King on opening Gingrich question
King on opening Gingrich question

    JUST WATCHED

    King on opening Gingrich question

MUST WATCH

King on opening Gingrich question 02:38
PLAY VIDEO
Gergen: Debate could win Gingrich S.C.
Gergen: Debate could win Gingrich S.C.

    JUST WATCHED

    Gergen: Debate could win Gingrich S.C.

MUST WATCH

Gergen: Debate could win Gingrich S.C. 01:01
PLAY VIDEO
Candidates go after each other in debate
Candidates go after each other in debate

    JUST WATCHED

    Candidates go after each other in debate

MUST WATCH

Candidates go after each other in debate 02:57
PLAY VIDEO
Gingrich: King 'did a great job'
Gingrich: King 'did a great job'

    JUST WATCHED

    Gingrich: King 'did a great job'

MUST WATCH

Gingrich: King 'did a great job' 03:45
PLAY VIDEO

He roasted Gingrich by stating that conservatives threw him out of his speakership after four years. These were effective critiques because they were personalized. When Santorum spoke, he was believable.

Finally, Santorum did a good job presenting his own ideas -- zero taxes for manufacturing corporations, his anti-abortion stance -- and his closing remarks were right on the mark. In them, he talked about his electability over President Barack Obama. He went point by point describing his differences with Obama on health care and bailouts -- reminding the audience not so subtly that Romney and Gingrich supported the bailouts. Santorum concluded by saying he was the only Republican on stage ever to beat an incumbent Democrat.

As for Gingrich, the very first thing he did in the debate is what you'll hear people talking about. I was stunned by moderator John King's first question, since I thought the counter move by Gingrich was so obvious. Anyone watching Gingrich in these debates knew exactly what he was about to do, which was attack the media. But King pressed on with a question about Gingrich's ex-wife and whether or not her allegation that Gingrich wanted an "open marriage" was true.

This was a mistake. Gingrich's marriages may be a campaign issue, but there's a difference between a campaign issue and a debate issue. Some concepts simply can't play out well in a debating format.

When this question came roaring out of the gate, I knew two things. First, the other candidates wouldn't take the bait and talk about something so lurid. After all, this isn't a simple question of divorce or marriage or fidelity. This question sought details. Who wants to debate Gingrich on the question of open marriages? Romney with his family history of polygamy? ("Yeah, Newt. Let's debate open marriages for a while!" ) It's no wonder that Romney immediately said, "Lets get to the real issues."

And second, Gingrich was about to play King like a fiddle. What happened? Playing the victim better than that hot girl who trips over a rock and falls down in a horror movie, Gingrich was "appalled" and "astounded" by the "vicious" and "negative" question, calling it "trash" to open a presidential debate with it. Theatrics or not, it stopped King and anyone else from daring to bring it up again.

And in asking it, King unwittingly played right into Gingrich's hand. One tip for debaters also holds true with lawyers (and moderators). Never ask a question for which you don't already know the answer. King should have heeded that advice.

Join CNN Opinion on Facebook and follow updates on Twitter.

      Election 2012

    • CHICAGO, IL - NOVEMBER 06:  U.S. President Barack Obama stands on stage with first lady Michelle Obama, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and Dr. Jill Biden after his victory speech on election night at McCormick Place November 6, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. Obama won reelection against Republican candidate, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

      Obama makes history, again

      A black man is returning to the White House. Four years ago, it was a first, the breaking of a racial barrier. Tuesday night, it was history redux. And more.
    • CHICAGO, IL - NOVEMBER 06:  U.S. President Barack Obama stands on stage after his victory speech at McCormick Place November 6, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. Obama won reelection against Republican candidate, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

      Five things we learned

      The 2012 presidential election shattered spending records, further polarized a divided country and launched a thousand hashtags.
    • Demanding more from second term

      Even though voters indicated to pollsters that their financial situation is the same or worse than it was four years ago, they put their trust in the president.
    • US President Barack Obama addresses a crowd of supporters on stage on election night November 6, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois. President Barack Obama swept to re-election Tuesday, forging history again by transcending a slow economic recovery and the high unemployment which haunted his first term to beat Republican Mitt Romney. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad        (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

      Victorious Obama faces challenges

      The president faces a long and familiar set of challenges after riding a wave of support from moderates, women and minorities to victory.
    • GOP retains grip on House

      Republicans kept a lock on the U.S. House of Representatives, a crucial victory after the party failed to wrest away the presidency from Barack Obama and the Senate from the Democrats.