Skip to main content
/technology

UK judge: 'Alarmism' in Gore film

  • Story Highlights
  • Guidance must accompany Gore's film being shown to students, UK judge rules
  • Judge says Gore film "broadly accurate," but lists nine problems with claims
  • Gore's claims made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration," judge says
  • Spokeswoman for Gore says judge supported key elements of documentary
  • Next Article in Technology »
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

LONDON, England (AP) -- Some of the assertions in Al Gore's Oscar-winning environmental documentary are not supported by scientific evidence, a British judge said in ruling on a challenge from a school official who did not want the film shown to students.

art.gore.afp.jpg

Al Gore's documentary is founded on science and fact, but in the context of exaggeration, a judge said.

The ruling was published Wednesday and it detailed High Court Judge Michael Burton's decision this month to allow film showings to go ahead in English secondary schools. But the judge said that written guidance to teachers designed to ensure Gore's views are not presented uncritically must accompany the showings.

Burton said he had no doubt the points raised in "An Inconvenient Truth" about the causes and likely effects of climate change are broadly accurate, but he found they were made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration."

Gore's film "is substantially founded upon scientific research and fact," Burton said. "Albeit that the science is used, in the hands of a talented politician and communicator, to make a political statement and to support a political program."

He said the government's plan to show the film violated laws banning the promotion of partisan political views in the classroom, but could proceed if teachers ensure that Gore's political views are not seen as being endorsed by schools.

Kalee Kreider, a spokeswoman for the former vice president, said the judge's decision backed key elements of the documentary.

"The ruling upheld fundamental pieces of the film and the scientific consensus that global warming is real and caused by human activities," she told The Associated Press. "Of the thousands of facts in the film, the judge only took issue with just a handful. And of that handful, we have the studies to back those pieces up."

Burton outlined nine problems -- including Gore's claim that sea level rises of 23 feet might occur in the immediate future -- something the judge characterized as "distinctly alarmist."

He also cited claims that Hurricane Katrina, the evaporation of most of Lake Chad and the melting of the snow on Mount Kilimanjaro were all caused by global warming. Burton said there was insufficient evidence to back those claims.

Burton's ruling follows a challenge from a part-time school official who complained that Gore's film was inaccurate and biased and should not be shown to pupils.

Stewart Dimmock, who works part-time on a school governing board, said he was fighting to have his children educated in an environment "free from bias and political spin." E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  • E-mail
  • Save
  • Print
Today's Featured Product:
Samsung SyncMaster T220
 7.0 out of 10
Recent Product Reviews:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ
 5.9 out of 10
DLO TransDock III (with IntelliTune)
 6.7 out of 10
Samsung ML-2851ND
 7.5 out of 10
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
© 2008 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.