|
| ||||||||||||||
Al-Rubaie: Most troops out by mid-2008Violence leaves at least 13 dead around Iraq
![]() A British soldier secures an area in the southern Iraqi city of Basra on Sunday. RELATEDSPECIAL REPORT
Interactive: Who's who in Iraq
Interactive: Sectarian divide
Timeline: Bloodiest days for civilians
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS(CNN) -- The majority of the U.S.-led multinational forces will most likely have left Iraq by mid-2008, and a gradual reduction in forces will begin at the end of this year, Iraq's national security adviser predicted Sunday. But U.S. officials, including President Bush, declined -- as they have in the past -- to make any predictions regarding U.S. troop levels in Iraq or whether the death Wednesday of terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi may hasten America's departure. "I believe by the end of this year the number of the multinational forces will be probably less than 100,000 in this country, and by the end of next year most of the multinational forces will have gone home," Mowaffak al-Rubaie said on CNN's "Late Edition." Violence continued in Iraq on Sunday, with various attacks leaving at least 13 people dead. Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. military official in Iraq, will be among national security team members and Cabinet members meeting with Bush this week at Maryland's Camp David to discuss the situation in Iraq. Earlier this week, Bush said Monday's meeting -- which was planned before al-Zarqawi died in a U.S. airstrike -- will focus on "how best to deploy America's resources in Iraq and achieve our shared goal of an Iraq that can govern itself, sustain itself and defend itself." Bush said Samir al-Sumaidie, Iraq's new ambassador to the United States, will join the discussion on Tuesday, and there will be a teleconferenced discussion with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and members of his Cabinet. On "Fox News Sunday," Casey said it is not likely a decision to add or cut troops in Iraq will be made. "But as I've said all along, I constantly evaluate the situation," he said. "And if I think I need more, I'll ask for more. If I think I need less, I'll tell the president I need less." He would not divulge what his assessment to the president will include. Paul Bremer, former U.S. administrator in Iraq, told ABC's "This Week" there should be no deadlines for troop withdrawal. "I think that's a mistake," he said. "That only encourages the terrorists to continue their fighting." The challenge that faces the coalition now is creating a strategy that says "here is how we intend, in a period of time, to defeat the insurgency." "Whether there should be more troops there ... I think it's the wrong question," he said. "I think the question is: What's the strategy to defeat the insurgency? It may be more [troops]. It may not be more. It may be different kinds of troops. It may be redeploying them to different areas." But the U.S. military can't maintain the current pace of deployment, retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey told NBC's "Meet the Press." If the United States had 10 years, he said, there would be a 99 percent probability "we'll achieve our objective, but I don't think we've got that much time," he said. "We've got to draw down and pretty soon -- maybe 50,000 to 100,000 troops by next summer; otherwise we risk breaking the force." Bush has indicated he'd like to get American troops out as soon as possible but has said withdrawing troops depends on victory in Iraq, or "a country that can sustain itself, govern itself and defend itself." Other developmentsCNN's Jennifer Deaton, Cal Perry and Mohammed Tawfeeq contributed to this report.
|
| |||||||||||||
| © 2007 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us. Site Map. |
|