|
| |||||||||||||
The mysteries of 'United 93'Will audiences pay to relive 9/11?By Todd Leopold ![]() Passengers get ready to challenge the hijackers in "United 93." QUICKVOTEON CNN TV Watch "Showbiz Tonight" on CNN Headline News at 7 p.m. ET weekdays.
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS(CNN) -- There's been a lot of debate over the new film "United 93," much of it revolving around the question: Is it too soon? It's been less than five years since the September 11 attacks, so putting out a movie about the day -- even one about the passengers who famously, and heroically, fought back against the terrorists -- is like ripping a scab off a fresh wound. (Do you think it's too soon? Send us your opinion.) But moving quickly in Hollywood, even on sensitive subjects, is nothing new. "The Best Years of Our Lives," about the sometimes difficult acclimation of war veterans to civilian life, came out a year after the end of World War II. "Battleground," the stark story of a squad in the Battle of the Bulge, came out five years after that brutal engagement. Many other war movies have come out during wartime, and films about other subjects -- civil rights, infamous crimes -- have come out fairly close to the actual events they dramatize. So, maybe the argument is, "Too much." Too much intensity, too much violence. But "United 93," though rated R, contains virtually no graphic violence and far less profanity than your average Quentin Tarantino movie. It's intense, but many movies are. In fact, though the ads have focused on the passengers and crew of the flight, a sizable chunk of the movie is devoted to the sober, if sometimes harried, reaction of professionals doing their jobs: air traffic controllers, the Federal Aviation Administration and the military. So why the trepidation? We were all there. We all saw the second plane hit the tower; we all saw the fiery hole in the Pentagon; we all saw the twin towers collapse. We all felt the panic of not knowing what was going to happen next -- of feeling, in an instant, the world turn upside down. For the passengers and crew of United 93, for thousands in New York and Washington, it happened in painful, tragic ways we'll never comprehend. But there was no happy ending for anybody. Which brings up another question: Will anyone see a movie without a happy ending? Eye on Entertainment wonders. Eye-opener"United 93" director and writer Paul Greengrass ("Bloody Sunday," "The Bourne Supremacy") cut his teeth on documentaries, and it shows. "United 93" plays as if cameras had been stationed throughout the plane, the air traffic control centers and military headquarters. Nobody appears to be acting. Greengrass even cast some of the people who responded on September 11. FAA operations manager Ben Sliney plays himself, as do a number of air traffic controllers and military personnel. The docudrama realism does have its drawbacks. Several critics have complained that there's little insight into individual characters; the film barely even mentions characters' names. Before the terrorists hijack the flight, the passengers on United 93 make small talk or sleep, just as anyone would do; after the hijacking, their minimal dialogue is all about their situation. But nobody has questioned the film's power. " 'United 93' is a tremendous experience of fear, bewilderment, and resolution, and, when you replay the movie in your head afterward, you are likely to think that Greengrass made all the right choices," wrote David Denby in The New Yorker. "This is the best movie so far this year," Richard Roeper said on "Ebert & Roeper." So, with all that, do you want to see it? You'll have to decide for yourself. "United 93" opens Friday. On screenOn the tubeSound wavesPaging readersVideo center
|
| ||||||||||||
| © 2007 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us. Site Map. |
|