|
| |||||||||||||
Everyone's a comedianThe new laugh track: Parody + repetitionBy Todd Leopold ![]() Chris Parnell and Andy Samberg in "Lazy Sunday." ON CNN TV Watch "Showbiz Tonight" on CNN Headline News at 7 p.m. ET weekdays.
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS(CNN) -- A few months ago, "Saturday Night Live's" Andy Samberg and Chris Parnell created a short film, "Lazy Sunday." Then came the copycats: "Lazy Muncie," In other words, they were parodies of a parody. There's nothing wrong with parody. Done well and with originality -- as with "Lazy Sunday" -- it can be literally breathtaking, as in a lightning gasp of "Oh, how clever!" recognition. But parodying parody is, to use an anachronistic metaphor, like making numerous carbon copies on a typewriter. The first copy, just below the original, is almost as sharp; the third or fifth copy, behind several sheets of paper, is smudged and unreadable. It's a pale imitation of the original. (For those who don't understand "carbon copy," "typewriter" or "paper," ask your parents.) Too bad coming up with something original is so much work, which leaves us with so much unfunny comedy with so little depth. (I'd call it a "farce," except farce -- with its exaggerated character types and split-second timing -- is hard.) Originality is why Pixar films are so good -- there's genuine story, heart and inventiveness beneath the jokes, which hasn't been true of many of that studio's competitors' works. And originality is what new technology can bring us, and already is. For all the "Lazy" ideas out there, many people are making short videos and sketches that show real bite and creativity. Unfortunately, not much of that originality has extended to Hollywood, where -- this Friday -- the new "Scary Movie 4" opens. Eye on Entertainment stifles a groan. Eye-openerIt's hard to believe that there have been three "Scary Movies" already -- and all of them, despite excellent box office returns, have been bad (and gotten progressively worse). The first one at least had the whiff of an original idea, or at least an idea that hadn't been done on the big screen in many years: take all the recent thrillers and horror flicks ("The Blair Witch Project," "The Sixth Sense," "The Matrix") and mock them all. (Never mind that "Scream" was a better version of this idea, since it was both a parody of horror flicks and a clever horror flick in its own right. Incidentally, "Scream's" original title was "Scary Movie.") "Scary Movie" was a Mad magazine parody come to life. But after the original, the net got wider and (if possible) dumber, and we were left with "Scary Movie 2" and "3," which parodied pretty much anything they wanted to -- usually with jokes straight out of the bathroom or the (pot-) smoke-filled dorm room. (If parody is an easy form of humor, then scatological jokes are the easiest building blocks of parody.) Yuk, yuk. The franchise has taken one strange turn. The first two films were directed by Keenan Ivory Wayans, but "Scary Movie 3" was directed by David Zucker, one of the people who reinvigorated throw-it-at-the-screen-and-see-what-sticks comedy. With his friend Jim Abrahams and brother Jerry Zucker, David Zucker wrote and co-directed "Airplane!", the 1980 movie that managed to combine the "Airport" films with "Zero Hour," old war movies and some inspired silliness, ending up with the 10th-best comedy of the 20th century (according to the American Film Institute Zucker's participation in "Scary Movie" didn't do much for the quality of the franchise: on the review aggregator Rottentomatoes.com The jury's still out on "Scary Movie 4," but its cast includes Dr. Phil McGraw -- and if that isn't a parody of a parody, I don't know what is. "Scary Movie 4" opens Friday. On screenOn the tubeSound wavesPaging readersVideo center
|
| ||||||||||||
| © 2007 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us. Site Map. |
|