Court keeps Gitmo detainee from seeing lawyer
From Bill Mears
CNN Washington Bureau
 |
Story Tools
RELATED
|
Gherebi v. Bush: (FindLaw) Order
|
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
|
Follow the news that matters to you. Create your own alert to be notified on topics you're interested in.
Or, visit Popular Alerts for suggestions.
|
|
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Thursday granted the government's request to keep a terrorism suspect being held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, from seeing his lawyer, at least until the justices decide the larger legal issue of what rights other "enemy combatants" are afforded.
Solicitor General Ted Olson last week filed an emergency appeal with the court, requesting a stay of a lower federal court order.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in December ruled a Libyan man captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan has the right to see a lawyer and have his appeal heard in a federal court.
The government asked for a stay until it files a more complete appeal with the high court.
An attorney hired by the man's family has demanded immediate access to his client.
Falen Gherebi is one of about 650 men in military custody at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. His family filed a class-action lawsuit on his behalf, protesting his detention.
The military says the detainees, captured mostly in Afghanistan and Pakistan, are suspected of being al Qaeda or Taliban fighters. Some have been held for more than two years. The detainees have been undergoing interrogation to determine whether they will face a military tribunal or be released back to their home countries.
The Gherebi case could be resolved with an upcoming Supreme Court case. The justices in April will hear oral arguments in a similar but separate appeal involving other Guantanamo detainees. A ruling in that case is expected by late June.
At issue is whether U.S. courts have jurisdiction to intervene in the continued U.S. military detention of citizens held overseas, and whether that detention violates constitutional and international law.
Olson had argued the 9th Circuit "refused to stay its proceedings" in the Gherebi ruling, even after the Supreme Court agreed to decide the same issues in the related case.
The appeals court was prepared to soon notify Gherebi of its ruling granting him legal representation.
Since the military is still conducting its interrogation, Olson said, allowing Gherebi access to an attorney would "interfere with the military's efforts to obtain intelligence from Gherebi and other Guantanamo detainees related to the ongoing war against terrorism."
The military has said its interrogations have yielded important intelligence information.
The government cites a 53-year-old case as precedent for denying courts the habeas corpus jurisdiction to hear appeals of non-citizens held on foreign soil. A writ of habeas corpus would require that a prisoner be brought before the court to determine if the person's detention is lawful and justified.
Lawyers for the prisoners, as well a number of civil rights and other groups, have argued the men should have the right to test the legality of their detention, calling it a basic constitutional principle.
Lower federal courts have split on the issue.
The case is Bush v. Gherebi (A-0637).