Skip to main content
CNN EditionU.S.
The Web     
Powered by
powered by Yahoo!
Iraq Banner

After Saddam, then what?

U.S. mulls options for postwar Iraq

From David Ensor

The United States' post-Saddam challenge: to build a stable government acceptable to the Iraqis
The United States' post-Saddam challenge: to build a stable government acceptable to the Iraqis

Story Tools

American Morning with Paula Zahn (7 a.m. EST): The challenges that might face a post-war Iraq. How would the country function without leader Saddam Hussein?
more video VIDEO
The Bush administration says the U.S. will stay 'not one day more' than necessary. CNN's David Ensor reports (February 25)
premium content
•  Commanders: U.S. | Iraq
•  Weapons: 3D Models
  • United Nations: Chief Hans Blix says 'Iraq could do more,' as reports say Mexico appears to be shifting to U.S. position in Security Council

  • Washington: Sources say U.S. and Saudi Arabia reach deal for complete access to Prince Sultan Air Base as operations center in case of war with Iraq, while Saudi foreign minister says use of base is for no-fly zone patrols only

  • London: Tony Blair braces for what could be a major revolt inside his own Labour Party, as House of Commons debates Iraq

  • Baghdad: Saddam Hussein rejects the idea of leaving: 'We will die here'

  • Washington: CNN learns U.S. intelligence officials Thave a list of 2,000 key members of Iraqi elite

    Iraq Tracker
    How long will the U.S. need to stay in Iraq to rebuild if Saddam is removed from power?

    Less than 2 years
    2-5 years
    More than 5 years

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- American and allied troops have been in Bosnia since 1995.

    They've been in Kosovo since 1999. They've been in Afghanistan since October 2001.

    And now there are concerns over how long U.S. troops may remain in Iraq if there is a war.

    U.S. Deputy national security adviser Stephen Hadley has one answer.

    "The answer is straightforward: We will stay as long as is necessary but not one day more," Hadley said.

    How long troops remain in Iraq depends on what the United States decides to do in the country -- transition quickly to some sort of unelected Iraqi leadership acceptable to the West, or transform Iraq into a democratic nation.

    Democrat Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware said he senses a split on the matter even within the Bush administration.

    "My sinking suspicion [from] Cheney, Rumsfeld and company, it is transition," Biden said earlier this month. "The president's occasional comments talk transformation."

    After a period of stabilizing the country under U.S. Army Gen. Tommy Franks, commander of U.S. Central Command, the United States and its allies may place a non-Iraqi civilian as head of Iraq.

    State Department officials talk about "transforming" Iraq after that with a new constitution, a new criminal code, and real democracy.

    It's the kind of project that took Gen. Douglas MacArthur seven years in post World War II Japan.

    Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Marc Grossman says the goal for postwar Iraq is clear.

    "We seek an Iraq that is democratic, that is unified, that is multi-ethnic, which has no weapons of mass destruction, which has cut its links to terrorists and is at peace with its neighbors," Grossman said.

    But writer Robert Baer, a former CIA operative who spent time in Iraq, warns against counting on U.S. soldiers, intelligence officers and bureaucrats to transform Iraq.

    "I think the best possibility is for the military to go in, get rid of Saddam, replace it with an acceptable government acceptable to the Iraqis and get out," Baer said. "Iraq is a hard place to rule and the less time we spend there the better."

    The trouble will be to find a new leader acceptable to an Iraq which is deeply divided among Shia and Sunni Muslims, Kurds, Turkmens and others, critics suggest.

    Although Secretary of State Colin Powell and others have made it clear that Iraq's oil wealth would not be used to pay for the war, officials say some of it could be used to help rebuild the country and shape a post-Saddam Iraq.

    Depending on how many years that takes, estimates say it could involve many billions of dollars more than the war itself.

    Costs of any war are still unknown.

    Earlier this year, White House Office of Management and Budget Director Mitch Daniels estimated a war with Iraq could cost between $50 billion and $60 billion. Congressional Democrats this past fall estimated the cost of a military attack against Iraq around $93 billion while Bush economic adviser Larry Lindsey -- who has since left the White House suggested war costs could top out at $200 billion.

    For latest developments, see's Iraq Tracker.

    Story Tools
    Subscribe to Time for $1.99 cover
    Top Stories
    Father guilty of killing 9 of his children
    Top Stories
    CNN/Money: Security alert issued for 40 million credit cards

    International Edition
    CNN TV CNN International Headline News Transcripts Advertise With Us About Us
       The Web     
    Powered by
    © 2005 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.
    A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us.
    external link
    All external sites will open in a new browser. does not endorse external sites.
     Premium content icon Denotes premium content.
    Add RSS headlines.