Gene research may help solve anthrax mystery
'A very powerful tool for comparison of whole genomes'
ROCKVILLE, Maryland (CNN) -- One expert predicts it will take a combination of "new science" and "good old-fashioned detective work" to find out who's responsible for the anthrax attacks that claimed five lives in the United States in the weeks after the September 11 terrorist attacks.
In a paper published this week in the journal Science, researchers at the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) in Rockville, Maryland, detail their contribution to the "new science" aspect of the investigation, a genetic comparison of anthrax samples.
Scientists there compared the anthrax that killed newspaper photo editor Bob Stevens in Florida with other samples of what's known as the "Ames strain" of bacillus anthracis, or anthrax. The Ames strain was originally isolated from a dead cow in Texas in 1981. This strain has since been sent to dozens, perhaps hundreds of research and defense facilities in the United States and Europe for study.
"In different labs over 21 years, they have developed mutations in their DNA sequence," says Claire Fraser, President of TIGR.
"And these are the regions we are focusing on, regions that are different, because that gives us the information we need to try to distinguish one from another," she says.
Identifying the mutations unique to each lab could eventually lead investigators to the source of the anthrax strain that killed Stevens.
"The critical thing about bacillus anthracis is that it has shown very little genetic variability," says Ronald Atlas, president-elect of the American Society for Microbiology.
"That really has been a problem in trying to fingerprint the organism," he says.
TIGR identified 60 markers, or unique genetic differences between the anthrax that killed Stevens and several other Ames samples. Of those 60, Fraser says 11 could help researchers discriminate between the Florida sample and the others. It's at least something to go on, considering that about 5 million pieces of DNA code are being compared.
"The fact we now have a number of sites in the genome to look at helps us eliminate some labs, and concentrate on others," says Atlas.
But even as the science may eventually pinpoint the lab from which the Florida sample or the other deadly anthrax came, it will take law enforcement skills to determine who took the bacteria -- which could have been stolen at any time over the past two decades.
While the TIGR findings may be an early step in finding a biological terrorist, the analysis technique may pay off with less sensational medical detective work.
"It's not just anthrax strains that this is going to help with, but all infectious diseases, in finding their sources," says Atlas, who also heads the Center for Deterrence of Biowarfare and Bioterrorism at the University of Louisville.
"This allows us to compare genomes from a strain that causes disease with any number of other strains, and based on that sort of analysis, begin to differentiate. So it's a very powerful tool for comparison of whole genomes," he says.
Anthrax scare in St. Louis
May 6, 2002
Study finds no health risk from irradiated mail
April 24, 2002
Anthrax terror remains a mystery
March 27, 2002
Six months later: Anthrax lessons learned
March 26, 2002
Report raises question of anthrax, hijacker link
March 23, 2002
Anthrax vaccine gets good grade, but could do better
March 6, 2002
Army base package likely had no anthrax
February 23, 2002
FBI asks microbiologists for help on anthrax
February 5, 2002
Reward in anthrax investigation doubles
January 23, 2002
American Society for Microbiology
The Institute for Genomic Research
University of Louisville
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
TECHNOLOGY TOP STORIES:
Report: SUVs pose danger to cars
New telemarketer tool trumps TeleZapper
Terra Lycos logs $2.2B loss
AOL to offer song downloads
Microsoft seeks fiscal fountain of youth
|Back to the top|