Skip to main content /TECH with IDG.net
CNN.com /TECH
CNN TV
EDITIONS

Study: Paper voting better than computers

IDG.net
graphic

(IDG) -- A nationwide study on U.S. voting systems finds that long-used methods of casting votes like paper ballots, optical scanning devices and lever machines are more dependable than electronic means like punch card and cash-machine-like systems.

The new study from the California Institute of Technology/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Voting Project focuses on the number of undervotes and overvotes, which make a category of votes called residual votes. This ballots include ones that have votes for more than one candidate, with no vote at all, or ones that are marked in such a fashion that they cannot be counted.

IDG.net INFOCENTER
IDG.net
Related IDG.net Stories
Features
Visit an IDG site


IDG.net search



According to the study, paper ballots, optical scanning devices and lever machines create a residual vote percentage of about 2 percent. More technology-intensive voting systems like punch cards and ATM (automatic teller machine)-like systems have a 3 percent residual vote count, the study finds.<

Talking with people who are knowledgeable about voting has led to the conclusion that the comfort level with technology has something to do with the slightly higher residual vote count, said Charles Stewart, a professor of political science at MIT, who is part of the approximately dozen people working on the study.

"We've heard stories of people casting votes and then turning the device off," he said. "It is not like an ATM machine where you use it every day."

The findings of the Caltech/MIT Voting Project have been submitted to the task force studying the election procedures in Florida. Caltech President David Baltimore and MIT President Charles M. Vest created the Voting Project in December in the hope of avoiding future vote problems that occurred in the 2000 U.S. presidential election.

Electronic voting is still in its infancy. According to Stewart about 2 percent of the U.S. voting population in 1980 voted by some electronic means. During last year's election, approximately 11 percent of the voting population voted electronically, he said.

"It is not very pervasive," Stewart said. "It is the fastest growing part (of new voting technology)."

The Caltech/MIT Voting Project team hopes to have some pretty definitive answers on the efficiencies of the existing voting technologies by June, Stewart said. Project members hope to work with engineers to develop new voting technology that is robust and yet practical, he said.



RELATED STORIES:
Electronic voting systems face obstacles to adoption
January 15, 2001
Punch-card ballots notorious for inaccuracies
November 15, 2000
Analysis: Internet lessons for Campaign 2004
November 15, 2000
Voter databases in disarray in many states
November 14, 2000
Experts: E-voting could have prevented U.S. election confusion
November 8, 2000

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Is Internet voting a threat to privacy?
(PCWorld.com)
Electronic voting systems face obstacles to adoption
(Computerworld)
Unisys, Microsoft, Dell to create new voting system
(InfoWorld.com)
A better ballot
(The Industry Standard)
Revive America's election process with technology
(InfoWorld.com)
Not voting on or off-line
(The Industry Standard)
Voter databases in disarray in many states
(Computerworld)
Security considerations for e-voting
(SunWorld)

RELATED SITES:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
California Institute of Technology


Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


 Search   





MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 













Back to the top