Corporate privacy policies scrutinized
(IDG) -- Many corporate privacy policies are too hard to find, too long and too confusing, according to one U.S. trade commissioner, who said companies should take steps to standardize their policies in much the same way food companies use nutrition labels that make it easy for consumers to count calories.
"In short, many privacy policies are beginning to look like complex legal documents that do not give consumers real choice," said Federal Trade Commissioner Sheila Anthony.
At the first Privacy and Data Protection Summit Thursday, among the trends Anthony cited as disturbing was a tendency among some companies to establish privacy policies that grant companies sweeping rights to sell and transfer customer data. "Some site owners take an arrogant view and say that they know best," she said.
But some corporate officials at the conference, which was sponsored by the Philadelphia-based Privacy Officers Association, said the federal government should take some of the blame for complex privacy policies.
Financial services companies, for instance, said that to comply with the privacy provision of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the financial modernization law approved in 1999 that takes effect July 1, privacy policies must include legal language from that act as well as from state laws affecting privacy.
Harriet Pearson, IBM's chief privacy officer, acknowledged that "we need to work toward making [privacy policies] simpler" but also said it's an evolving process. Only a few years ago, many companies had no privacy policies, she said. Today, there are ongoing industry initiatives to improve policies, said Pearson.
Anthony also said there are limits to what the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can do to make companies improve their practices. "I believe the lack of comprehensive federal privacy legislation to protect consumer privacy has created a schizophrenic environment that is bound to get worse," she said.
More than 450 privacy-related bills have been introduced in state legislatures, raising the possibility of a patchwork of laws making an "untenable situation" for businesses, said Anthony. Moreover, it's expected that the European Union will begin enforcing its own data-protection laws next summer, giving European residents greater privacy protection than U.S. citizens have.
Congress, meanwhile, is considering almost 50 privacy bills. However, the outlook for any kind of privacy legislation this year appears remote as lawmakers stumble over the details.
"The way things are in Congress right now, it may well take a push from the administration to get something out," said Joel Winston, acting associate director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.
Privacy advocates: Amended spam bill lacks teeth
RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
New tools attack privacy issues
Federal Trade Commission
Study: Gadget sales flat
Protest slams Dell's use of prison labor
Steve Jobs keeps Apple in the limelight
N. Y. plans to heal skyline
Stocks rise on Case departure
Lieberman's presidential announcement today
New arrests may be linked to UK ricin scare
Jordan says farewell for the third time
Shaq could miss playoff game for child's birth
Ex-USOC official says athletes bent drug rules
|Back to the top|