Skip to main content
ad info

 
CNN.com Books - News
  Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
BOOKS
TOP STORIES

Robert Kennedy: The 'younger brother full of pain'

Author's survival tips for women: All you need are 'Three Black Skirts'

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

More than 1,700 killed in India quake; fear of aftershocks spreads

Bush White House says it won't be distracted by pranks of past tenants

After respite, California power supply close to running on empty

McCain, Lott agree 'in principle' on campaign finance reform schedule

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

LAW

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

HEALTH

TRAVEL

FOOD

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image



A special feature brought to you by
Salon.com

Harry Potter fans detect devilish discrepancy

graphic

Did J.K. Rowling goof or has she another trick up her sleeve?

July 24, 2000
Web posted at: 10:37 a.m. EDT (1437 GMT)

Editor's note: The following story contains spoiler details concerning the ending of "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire."

(SALON) -- In the past two weeks, everyone from Harold Bloom to Jay Leno has had a chance to talk about J.K. Rowling's new book, the 752-page "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire." But while discussion has ranged from the literary merits of the book to how Scholastic was able to pull off an astounding 3.8 million-copy print run in nearly absolute secrecy, a handful of fans have noticed what may or may not be a slip on Rowling's part.

One of the most highly praised features of the Harry Potter series has been the detailed history of the world that surrounds its orphaned hero. But during the climactic confrontation at the conclusion of "Goblet of Fire," the very order in which Harry's parents were murdered by the evil Lord Voldemort seems to be brought into question. During the high-stakes battle between Voldemort and Harry, as a result of complications in the wands that they both use, Harry forces the ghosts of all those whom Voldemort has killed with his wand to eject themselves momentarily into the living world.

  MESSAGE BOARD
 
  ALSO
 

The book specifically notes that they emerge in the reverse of the order in which they were killed. First comes Cedric, the popular Hogwarts Quidditch player, who was most recently killed by Voldemort, then the groundskeeper of the Riddle Estate (whose murder was excerpted in Newsweek), then "missing" witch Bertha Jorkins, followed by Harry's parents. Here is where fans of the series are scratching their heads. Margo Alexandra, a student at the University of Chicago, was one of many who noticed that "Harry's parents come out in the wrong order."

Rowling's previous books have indicated that Harry's father died first, in an attempt to protect his wife and child, and that only after his failure was Harry's mother killed, while placing a spell over her son that granted him some form of protection from Voldemort. But when the ghosts start coming out of Voldemort's wand, Harry's dad comes out first, with his mother close behind.

Was the discrepancy a mistake? A slip-up? Or something more? What other plot twists might J.K. Rowling have up her sleeve? The only thing her fans can do is sit back, maybe reread the first book or two, gripe about the upcoming movie and wait for "Harry Potter V."



RELATED STORIES:
When he talks, 'Harry Potter' fans listen
July 18, 2000
'Harry' and hype
July 13, 2000
'Potter' sales breaking records
July 10, 2000
'Harry Potter' frenzy crosses the Atlantic
July 8, 2000

RELATED SITES:
Warner Bros.: 'Harry Potter' movie Web site
Scholastic: Harry Potter
Harry Potter Web site
Random House Audio: Harry Potter
The Unofficial Harry Potter Fan Club

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 Search   

Back to the top  © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.