Skip to main content
ad info

 
CNN.com  law center > news
trials and cases
open forum
law library
 
Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
LAW
TOP STORIES

Prosecutor says witnesses saw rap star shoot gun in club

Embassy bombing defendants' confessions admissible, says U.S. Judge

Excerpt: John Grisham's 'A Painted House'

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Bush signs order opening 'faith-based' charity office for business

Rescues continue 4 days after devastating India earthquake

DaimlerChrysler employees join rapidly swelling ranks of laid-off U.S. workers

Disney's GO.com is a goner

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

TRAVEL

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image

find law dictionary
 

Jury seated for Branch Davidian wrongful-death lawsuit

image
A memorial stone and 87 trees, one for each of the 87 people the Branch Davidians say died in the fire, stand in a Waco,Texas, park  

June 19, 2000
Web posted at: 6:45 p.m. EDT (2245 GMT)


In this story:

The impact of the case

The background in brief

The main issues

RELATED STORIES, SITES icon



WACO, Texas (CNN) -- With opening statements set to begin Tuesday, a jury was seated Monday afternoon in the wrongful-death lawsuit against the federal government brought by relatives and survivors of the 1993 FBI raid on the Branch Davidians' compound.

Six jurors and one alternate were selected to hear the case in an advisory role. Four women and three men were picked to sit on the panel. Juries are not typically used in federal civil cases, but U.S. District Judge Walter Smith may consider the jury's recommendation in issuing his ruling.

The civil lawsuit arose from the deaths of about 80 Branch Davidians at the Christian apocalyptic sect's compound outside Waco.

 VIDEO
VideoThe U.S. Government faces lawsuit filed on behalf of the Branch Davidians charging wrongful death in the Waco tragedy. CNN's Tony Clark reports.
Real 28K 80K
Windows Media 28K 80K
 
  PERSPECTIVE
Two views of Waco from a former FBI investigator and a Branch Davidian survivor
 
  MESSAGE BOARD
  CASE FILE
Waco Revisited
  DOCUMENTS
  • Jury foreperson's speech at Waco memorial service

  • Report suggesting changes in federal law enforcement following Waco

  • Imagery analysis report by Vector Data Systems
  •   LEGAL RESOURCES

    Latest Legal News

    Law Library

    FindLaw Consumer Center

    Among those killed was David Koresh, the sect's charismatic leader. Seventeen children also died.

    The plaintiffs -- about 100 family members of those who died -- say the government used excessive force during the standoff which began on February 28, 1993 and ended on April 19, 1993.

    The defendant, the U.S. government, says it was justified in using armed force to end a 51-day standoff because the Branch Davidians left agents with no other choice.

    The impact of the case

    The case once again shines the spotlight on the government's actions during the raid and standoff that made headlines around the world and led to congressional inquiries. The congressional inquiries cleared the government of wrongdoing, but the Waco issue raised concerns whether about the government goes too far to quell dissenting voices.

    The bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City occurred on the second anniversary of the Waco fire. Prosecutors have said the bomb plotters were angered by what happened in Waco.

    "What's important to us is that the truth come out about what the law enforcement was doing out there," said U.S. Attorney Michael Bradford, lead counsel for the government. "While everything wasn't done perfectly and lessons were learned, everything that was done out there was done in good faith under difficult circumstances."

    Michael Caddell, a Houston attorney representing about 50 estates, said the primary motivation for a number of plaintiffs is holding the government accountable, not getting money.

    "It's about acknowledgment of shared responsibility and a commitment that this will never happen again," he said.

    James Brannon, who is representing Koresh's grandmother and the estate of his three dead children, said the government was "careless" in planning the raid and throughout the standoff.

    "We're going to be trying to prove that the government was careless in the planning of the raid ... in the force that was use at the initial raid, and then further on down the line, in the way in which they handled the events on the 19th of April 1993," he told CNN earlier Monday.

    The background in brief

    On February 28, 1993, agents of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms went to the Branch Davidian compound, called Mount Carmel, to investigate reports that the sect was hoarding weapons. In the ensuing gun fight, four agents and six Davidians were killed.

    image
    U.S. Attorney Bradford says the government wants the truth to come out about what law enforcement was doing in Waco  

    The standoff began and the FBI took over. FBI agents repeatedly asked the Davidians to surrender but the Davidians refused to bow to anyone's authority but God's. The FBI played music and sounds offensive to the sect. On the morning of April 19, an FBI tank rammed the compound's walls. The FBI sprayed tear gas and fired tear-gas canisters at the compound.

    About noon that day, there was an explosion in the compound and Mount Carmel went up in flames.

    To this day, who caused the fire remains controversial. The government says Koresh ordered his followers to set the compound ablaze to avoid surrendering to the government. The Branch Davidians say the fire was caused by the FBI's use of incendiary tear-gas canisters.

    A number of other aspects of the case also are in dispute. For instance, the families allege that the government at times initiated the shooting exchanges, pointing to flashes on a surveillance tape as proof of gunfire from the agents. The government argues those flashes were caused by sunlight glinting off debris in the compound.

    The main issues

    The trial revolves around four issues:
      • Did the BATF agents shoot indiscriminately into the compound on February 28?
      • Did the FBI start and spread the fire on April 19?
      • Did the FBI prematurely demolish the compound?
      • Did the FBI prevent firefighters from reaching the compound in a timely fashion after the compound went up in flames?

    Smith last week removed a controversial question from the proceedings - whether government agents shot at Davidians during the final hours of the siege.

    He said the issue would not be addressed during the trial - or considered by the jury -- because a court-appointed expert fell ill and would be unable to attend the trial.

    Technically, the trial is a non-jury trial, but the judge has taken the fairly unusual step of calling for a jury to serve in an advisory capacity to help him sift through the evidence and make findings of fact.

    image
    Plaintiffs' attorney Caddell says his clients' primary motivation is holding the government accountable  

    Judges have discretion to ask that such juries be seated. But in this case, Smith does not have to accept the jury's findings, said Sol Wisenberg, a Washington attorney who has followed the case closely.

    Until 1946, when the Federal Tort Claims Act was passed, the government could not be sued because it has sovereign immunity, a doctrine that absolved actions that could be construed as wrong, said Wisenberg, a former Texas prosecutor.

    The Federal Tort Claims Act allowed citizens to sue the federal government -- but the law specified that trials against the government could not be decided by juries, Wisenberg said.

    Wisenberg said the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, Michael Caddell, faces a difficult task in proving government culpability because of the so-called "discretionary function" exception in the 1946 law. That exception says a government agent cannot be held liable for doing his or her duty.

    According to Wisenberg, the government will argue that it is the agents' job to decide whether to use force and how much force to use. "That's going to be real tough to overcome," he said.

    CNN National Correspondent Tony Clark and The Associated Press contributed to this report.



    RELATED STORIES:
    Reno questioned by Danforth for six hours; Davidians lawyer attacks Vector report
    May 11, 2000
    Waco investigator found dead at his office in Maryland
    April 30, 2000
    Judge: Question of whether FBI shot at Branch Davidians remains open
    April 24, 2000
    Branch Davidians attorney critical of Reno's deposition
    March 28, 2000
    Opposing views of new test videotape in Waco debate
    March 20, 2000
    Documents: FBI wanted clearance to shoot unarmed Branch Davidians
    October 8, 1999
    Tear gas canister 'bounced off' Waco bunker
    September 3, 1999
    FBI tape shows field commander OK'd use of tear gas at Waco
    September 2, 1999

    RELATED SITES:
    Federal Bureau of Investigation
    United States Attorney's Office, Central District of California
    Branch Davidian
    Federal Tort Claims Act -- Defined & Explained


    Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
    External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
     Search


    Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines.